Repository navigation
Adopt suffix-based Vitest test routing - #67
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedPull request was closed or merged during review 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR refactors Vitest test discovery from explicit file path listings to convention-based filename suffixes ( Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@cursor, please rebase on main and make necessary adjustments based on the changes in main. |
|
Summary
Testing
|
Co-authored-by: Kent C. Dodds <me+github@kentcdodds.com>
Co-authored-by: Kent C. Dodds <me+github@kentcdodds.com>
e0e5cfe to
2060886
Compare
|
🔎 Preview deployed: https://kody-pr-67.kentcdodds.workers.dev Worker: Mocks:
|
…y-hq#67) When a one-shot fetch fails to bundle, agents using --json need a structured object on stdout (human mode still prints once via stderr). Co-authored-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com>


Summary
mainTesting
npm run testnpm run test:mcpSummary by CodeRabbit