-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix/reef sign tx #104
Fix/reef sign tx #104
Conversation
WalkthroughThe update modifies the chain registration process by reversing the parameter order in factory closures for several chain entries. Additionally, it adjusts the transaction signing logic in the Substrate module by conditionally assigning values to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Substrate
participant Payload
Client->>Substrate: Call sign_tx(symbol)
alt symbol == "REEF"
Substrate->>Payload: Set mode = None, metadata_hash = None
else symbol != "REEF"
Substrate->>Payload: Set mode = Some(0), metadata_hash = Some(0)
end
Substrate->>Client: Return signed transaction
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning Review ran into problems🔥 ProblemsErrors were encountered while retrieving linked issues. Errors (1)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
deny.toml (1)
51-56
: Advisory Configuration Addition – Valid Update.The new
[advisories]
section adds an ignore list for"RUSTSEC-2024-0436"
and is correctly formatted. The inline comment clearly explains that the advisory is being ignored due to the "paste" crate being unmaintained yet still required by "uniffy". This configuration change appears intentional and aligns with dependency management practices. However, it might be beneficial to ensure that this decision is documented in your project’s changelog or relevant project documentation, so future maintainers understand the rationale behind ignoring these advisories.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro (Legacy)
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lock
is excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
deny.toml
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: format
Summary by CodeRabbit