Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

README: Suggest go get -u by default. #93

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 18, 2016
Merged

README: Suggest go get -u by default. #93

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 18, 2016

Conversation

dmitshur
Copy link
Contributor

@dmitshur dmitshur commented Feb 9, 2016

Suggesting go get -u is a safer default. It results in a more predictable action, the user will end up with the latest version of errcheck and all its dependencies. Otherwise, the versions users end up with will be arbitrary, which may lead to issues. If users prefer not to update dependencies, they can always go get without -u flag.

As an example of the issue this would help resolve, see #92.

Suggesting `go get -u` is a safer default. It results in a more predictable action, the user will end up with the latest version of `errcheck` and all its dependencies. Otherwise, the versions users end up with will be arbitrary, which may lead to issues. If users prefer not to update dependencies, they can always `go get` without `-u` flag.

As an example of the issue this would help resolve, see #92.
@dmitshur
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kisielk, what do you think about this PR? See #94 as another example where it could've helped.

kisielk added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2016
README: Suggest go get -u by default.
@kisielk kisielk merged commit f76568f into kisielk:master Feb 18, 2016
@kisielk
Copy link
Owner

kisielk commented Feb 18, 2016

Good idea. Hopefully that clears up some confusion :)

@kisielk
Copy link
Owner

kisielk commented Feb 18, 2016

Sorry, GitHub notifications are a total mess for me so I didn't see the incoming PR first time around. I didn't even get the @ notice this time...

@kisielk
Copy link
Owner

kisielk commented Feb 18, 2016

Heh, just now I got the notification for the @ mention, thanks GitHub.

@dmitshur dmitshur deleted the patch-1 branch February 18, 2016 21:38
@dmitshur
Copy link
Contributor Author

That's surprising, you're watching this repo so I expected you to get a notification.

Thanks for merging!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants