Fix retrieve components by language #90
Conversation
Review or Edit in CodeSandboxOpen the branch in Web Editor • VS Code • Insiders |
WalkthroughThe changes in the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Script as Processing Script
participant API as Snippet API
participant Component as Component Processor
loop For Each Language
Script->>API: switchSnippetLanguage(language)
API-->>Script: Language Switch Confirmation
Script->>Component: Process Component
end
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
index.mjs (1)
172-180: Make the HTTP method more robustCurrently, the
postDatafunction accepts a dynamic HTTP method parameter without validation. Consider transforming the parameter to uppercase or adding a validation step to ensure only valid HTTP verbs are used. This will improve clarity and prevent errors if an unsupported method is accidentally passed in.async function postData(url, data, method = 'POST') { + const validMethods = ['GET', 'POST', 'PUT', 'PATCH', 'DELETE']; + const normalizedMethod = method.toUpperCase(); + if (!validMethods.includes(normalizedMethod)) { + throw new Error(`Unsupported HTTP method: ${method}`); + } const body = JSON.stringify(data); return fetchHttps( url, { - method, + method: normalizedMethod, headers: { 'content-type': 'application/json', 'content-length': Buffer.byteLength(body),
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
index.mjs(5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
index.mjs (2)
362-371: Confirm 303 status code usage for success
This function treats any 303 status code as success. Although that may match the current behavior of the endpoint, it’s somewhat unusual. You may want to confirm the endpoint's expected behavior or switch to a more standard success check (e.g., 2xx range) if the API changes in the future.
246-250: Handle undefined snippet gracefully
If component.snippet or snippet.name is not defined, calling snippet.name.toLowerCase() could throw a runtime error. Consider adding a null check or providing a default value to safeguard against unexpected undefined properties.
const snippet = component.snippet
+ if (!snippet || !snippet.name) {
+ console.warn("Skipping component due to missing snippet or snippet name.");
+ return;
+ }
const language = snippet.name.toLowerCase()
if (!languages.includes(language)) return✅ Verification successful
Let me verify if there are any existing null checks for component.snippet or if there are any cases where it could be undefined.
Let me check how component is defined and used before this code to understand if it could potentially be undefined.
Let me check how the processComponent function is called and where the component object comes from.
Let me check where the components array is populated and how it's structured.
From the context gathered, I can see that the components are loaded from a JSON data structure parsed from a webpage's #app data attribute, and the code processes these components in a loop. Since this data comes from an external source, it's prudent to add the null checks as suggested in the review.
Handle undefined snippet gracefully
The suggested null check is appropriate since the component data is loaded from an external source and could potentially be malformed. Adding the null check will prevent runtime errors.
- In
index.mjs, add the null check before accessingsnippet.name:
const snippet = component.snippet
+ if (!snippet || !snippet.name) {
+ console.warn("Skipping component due to missing snippet or snippet name.");
+ return;
+ }
const language = snippet.name.toLowerCase()
if (!languages.includes(language)) return🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the definition and usage of component.snippet
ast-grep --pattern 'component.snippet'
# Search for any existing null checks on component.snippet
ast-grep --pattern 'if (!$_snippet)'
# Look at the context where this code is used
rg "component\.snippet" -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 430
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for the component parameter definition and usage
rg -B 10 "const snippet = component\.snippet"
# Check how components are processed/mapped
ast-grep --pattern 'components.map'
# Look for any component type definitions or interfaces
rg -t ts -t js "interface.*Component|type.*Component"
Length of output: 570
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for calls to processComponent
rg "processComponent\(" -B 5 -A 5
# Look for the full implementation of processComponent function
ast-grep --pattern 'function processComponent'
# Look for any array operations that might call processComponent
rg "\.forEach.*processComponent|\.map.*processComponent"
Length of output: 947
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for where components array is defined/populated
rg "const components = " -B 5 -A 5
# Look for any component extraction or processing
ast-grep --pattern '$_components = $_'
# Look for the structure of components being processed
rg "components\[" -B 3 -A 3
Length of output: 1962
|
|
||
| for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) { | ||
| const url = urls[i] | ||
| console.log(`⏳ Processing #${i + 1}: ${url}...`) | ||
| const components = await processComponentPage(url) | ||
| mergeDeep(library, components) | ||
| console.log() | ||
| for (let j = 0; j < languages.length; j++) { | ||
| const language = languages[j] | ||
| console.log(`🔍 Switching to language: ${language}`) | ||
| const success = await switchSnippetLanguage(language) | ||
|
|
||
| if (!success) { | ||
| console.log(`🚫 Could not switch to language: ${language}`) | ||
| return 1 | ||
| } | ||
| const components = await processComponentPage(url) | ||
| mergeDeep(library, components) | ||
| console.log() | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Unused result from processComponentPage
processComponentPage(url) does not return an object, but the code assigns its (undefined) return value to components and then calls mergeDeep(library, components). If data is supposed to be aggregated in library, consider returning meaningful data from processComponentPage; otherwise, remove the merge call to clarify the intended usage.
Hello !
I submitted a temporary fix (the code can be rewritten) for the issue reported here : #89
Tailwind has changed the way to retrieve different versions of the code for each programming language.
It is now necessary to call the endpoint
https://tailwindui.com/snippet-languageto switch the programming language version displayed on the page.I also noticed that there was a version of the code, and in my fix, I set it to version v3.4.
The download time is now approximately 128.952 seconds.
As part of this change, there is now a separate folder for each programming language.
You might want to consider reverting it to the previous structure and combining everything into a single folder.
Have a nice day !
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
PUTrequest.Bug Fixes