Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade numpy from 1.21.3 to 1.22.2 #21

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gitworkflows
Copy link
Contributor

@gitworkflows gitworkflows commented Dec 9, 2024

User description

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 3 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • examples/tracking/requirements.txt
⚠️ Warning
ultralytics 8.0.151 requires scipy, which is not installed.
ultralytics 8.0.151 has requirement numpy>=1.22.2, but you have numpy 1.21.3.

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 NULL Pointer Dereference


PR Type

dependencies


Description

  • Updated numpy version in requirements.txt to >=1.22.2 to fix security vulnerabilities.
  • This change was made to comply with ultralytics dependency requirements and to address specific vulnerabilities identified by Snyk.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Dependencies
requirements.txt
Pin `numpy` version to address vulnerabilities                     

examples/tracking/requirements.txt

  • Added a version constraint for numpy to be >=1.22.2.
  • The change was made to address security vulnerabilities.
  • +1/-0     

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    Copy link

    sourcery-ai bot commented Dec 9, 2024

    Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

    This PR is a security update that upgrades the numpy dependency from version 1.21.3 to 1.22.2 to address three vulnerabilities. The change is implemented by adding a pinned version requirement for numpy in the requirements.txt file.

    No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

    File-Level Changes

    Change Details Files
    Added explicit numpy version requirement to address security vulnerabilities
    • Added numpy>=1.22.2 as a pinned dependency requirement
    • Included a comment explaining the version pin is for security purposes
    examples/tracking/requirements.txt

    Tips and commands

    Interacting with Sourcery

    • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
    • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
    • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
      issue from a review comment by replying to it.
    • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
      request title to generate a title at any time.
    • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
      the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
      this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

    Customizing Your Experience

    Access your dashboard to:

    • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
      summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
    • Change the review language.
    • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
    • Adjust other review settings.

    Getting Help

    Copy link

    coderabbitai bot commented Dec 9, 2024

    Important

    Review skipped

    Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

    Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

    You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


    Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

    ❤️ Share
    🪧 Tips

    Chat

    There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

    • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
      • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
      • Generate unit testing code for this file.
      • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
    • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
      • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
    • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
      • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
      • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
      • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

    Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

    CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

    • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
    • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
    • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
    • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
    • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
    • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai help to get help.

    Other keywords and placeholders

    • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
    • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
    • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

    CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

    • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
    • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
    • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

    Documentation and Community

    • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
    • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
    • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

    Copy link

    @sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    We have skipped reviewing this pull request. Here's why:

    • It seems to have been created by a bot ('[Snyk]' found in title). We assume it knows what it's doing!
    • We don't review packaging changes - Let us know if you'd like us to change this.

    Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Dependency Conflict
    The warning message indicates that ultralytics 8.0.151 already requires numpy>=1.22.2, but currently has numpy 1.21.3. This could cause version conflicts.

    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    General
    Add an upper version constraint to prevent potential breaking changes from major version updates

    Add an upper bound version constraint for numpy to prevent potential future
    compatibility issues. Use the format numpy>=1.22.2,<2.0.0

    examples/tracking/requirements.txt [5]

    -numpy>=1.22.2 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
    +numpy>=1.22.2,<2.0.0 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Adding an upper version bound is a good practice to prevent potential breaking changes from major version updates, especially for security-sensitive dependencies. This helps maintain stability and predictability in the project's dependencies.

    7

    💡 Need additional feedback ? start a PR chat

    @gitworkflows
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    🎉 Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

    security/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants