Appending to list immediately following its definition

[gitworkflows]

User description

(Please add to the PR name the issue/s that this PR would close if merged by using a Github keyword. Example: <feature name>. Closes #999. If your PR is made by a single commit, please add that clause in the commit too. This is all required to automate the closure of related issues.)

Description

Please include a summary of the change.

Related issues

Please add related issues.

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected).

Checklist

• I have read and understood the rules about how to Contribute to this project.
• The pull request is for the branch develop.
• I have added documentation of the new features.
• Linters (Black, Flake, Isort) gave 0 errors. If you have correctly installed pre-commit, it does these checks and adjustments on your behalf.
• I have added tests for the feature/bug I solved. All the tests (new and old ones) gave 0 errors.
• If changes were made to an existing model/serializer/view, the docs were updated and regenerated (check CONTRIBUTE.md).
• If the GUI has been modified:
  • I have a provided a screenshot of the result in the PR.
  • I have created new frontend tests for the new component or updated existing ones.

Important Rules

• If you miss to compile the Checklist properly, your PR won't be reviewed by the maintainers.
• If your changes decrease the overall tests coverage (you will know after the Codecov CI job is done), you should add the required tests to fix the problem
• Everytime you make changes to the PR and you think the work is done, you should explicitly ask for a review. After being reviewed and received a "change request", you should explicitly ask for a review again once you have made the requested changes.

---

PR Type

enhancement

---

Description

• Simplified the initialization of the rows list in the feeds_response function by combining its definition and first append operation. This change improves code readability and efficiency.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	views.py Simplify list initialization in CSV response handling        api/views.py Simplified list initialization by combining definition and first append. Improved code readability and efficiency. +1/-2

---

💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request optimizes the code for appending to a list immediately following its definition in the feeds_response function. The change simplifies the list initialization and appending process, making the code more concise and efficient.

Class diagram for feeds_response function changes

classDiagram
    class feeds_response {
        - list rows
        + list rows = [[license_text]]
    }
    note for feeds_response "Simplified list initialization and appending process"

Loading

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Simplified list initialization and appending in the CSV format handling	Removed separate list initialization and appending steps Combined list creation and first element addition into a single line Maintained the existing functionality while reducing code complexity	api/views.py

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Code Optimization The change combines list initialization with the first append operation. While this is a minor optimization, it's worth considering if it significantly improves readability or performance in this context.

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Score
Enhancement	Simplify list creation using a list comprehension for improved readability and potential performance gains Consider using a list comprehension to create the rows list in a more concise and efficient manner. This approach can improve readability and potentially enhance performance, especially for larger datasets. api/views.py [190-192] -rows = [[license_text]] -for ioc in iocs: - rows.append([ioc.name]) +rows = [[license_text]] + [[ioc.name] for ioc in iocs] Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion to use a list comprehension for creating the rows list is valid as it simplifies the code and enhances readability. It also potentially improves performance by reducing the number of append operations, making it a worthwhile enhancement.	7

💡 Need additional feedback ? start a PR chat

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @gitworkflows - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[sourcery-ai]

suggestion (performance): Consider using extend() for adding IOC names to the rows list

Instead of using a loop to append each IOC name individually, you could use the extend() method to add all IOC names at once. This approach is more efficient, especially for larger lists. For example: rows.extend([ioc.name] for ioc in iocs)

Suggested change

	rows = [[license_text]]
	rows = [[license_text]]
	rows.extend([ioc.name] for ioc in iocs)
	pseudo_buffer = Echo()