Skip to content

Conversation

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link

Pull request for series with
subject: libbpf: Remove unnecessary conversion to bool
version: 1
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=378773

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: d3bec01
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=378773
version: 1

kernel-patches-bot and others added 2 commits November 6, 2020 13:27
Fix following warning from coccinelle:

./tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c:1478:43-48: WARNING: conversion to bool not needed here

Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <[email protected]>
@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: 6f64e47
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=378773
version: 1

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=378773 expired. Closing PR.

@kernel-patches-bot kernel-patches-bot deleted the series/378773=>bpf branch November 10, 2020 22:20
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2020
At the time being, PPC32 has Classical BPF support.

The test_bpf module exhibits some failure:

	test_bpf: #298 LD_IND byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #299 LD_IND halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #301 LD_IND halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #303 LD_ABS byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #304 LD_ABS halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #306 LD_ABS halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times)

	test_bpf: Summary: 371 PASSED, 7 FAILED, [119/366 JIT'ed]

Fixing this is not worth the effort. Instead, remove support for
classical BPF and prepare for adding Extended BPF support instead.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2020
At the time being, PPC32 has Classical BPF support.

The test_bpf module exhibits some failure:

	test_bpf: #298 LD_IND byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #299 LD_IND halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #301 LD_IND halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #303 LD_ABS byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #304 LD_ABS halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #306 LD_ABS halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times)

	test_bpf: Summary: 371 PASSED, 7 FAILED, [119/366 JIT'ed]

Fixing this is not worth the effort. Instead, remove support for
classical BPF and prepare for adding Extended BPF support instead.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2021
At the time being, PPC32 has Classical BPF support.

The test_bpf module exhibits some failure:

	test_bpf: #298 LD_IND byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #299 LD_IND halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #301 LD_IND halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #303 LD_ABS byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #304 LD_ABS halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #306 LD_ABS halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times)

	test_bpf: Summary: 371 PASSED, 7 FAILED, [119/366 JIT'ed]

Fixing this is not worth the effort. Instead, remove support for
classical BPF and prepare for adding Extended BPF support instead.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2021
At the time being, PPC32 has Classical BPF support.

The test_bpf module exhibits some failure:

	test_bpf: #298 LD_IND byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #299 LD_IND halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #301 LD_IND halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #303 LD_ABS byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #304 LD_ABS halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #306 LD_ABS halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times)

	test_bpf: Summary: 371 PASSED, 7 FAILED, [119/366 JIT'ed]

Fixing this is not worth the effort. Instead, remove support for
classical BPF and prepare for adding Extended BPF support instead.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2021
At the time being, PPC32 has Classical BPF support.

The test_bpf module exhibits some failure:

	test_bpf: #298 LD_IND byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #299 LD_IND halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #301 LD_IND halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #303 LD_ABS byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #304 LD_ABS halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #306 LD_ABS halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times)

	test_bpf: Summary: 371 PASSED, 7 FAILED, [119/366 JIT'ed]

Fixing this is not worth the effort. Instead, remove support for
classical BPF and prepare for adding Extended BPF support instead.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2021
At the time being, PPC32 has Classical BPF support.

The test_bpf module exhibits some failure:

	test_bpf: #298 LD_IND byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #299 LD_IND halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #301 LD_IND halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #303 LD_ABS byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #304 LD_ABS halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #306 LD_ABS halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times)

	test_bpf: Summary: 371 PASSED, 7 FAILED, [119/366 JIT'ed]

Fixing this is not worth the effort. Instead, remove support for
classical BPF and prepare for adding Extended BPF support instead.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants