Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix incorrect argument name and update description in RNN documentation #20525

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2024

Conversation

rameshdange5191
Copy link
Contributor

The documentation for the base class for recurrent layers (class RNN exported as keras.layers.RNN) incorrectly mentioned the call argument sequences as inputs. This PR corrects the argument's name in the documentation and updates the argument's description to align more closely with similar arguments in similar layers.

Copy link

google-cla bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.11%. Comparing base (4895458) to head (4415772).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #20525   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.11%   82.11%           
=======================================
  Files         515      515           
  Lines       47790    47790           
  Branches     7486     7486           
=======================================
  Hits        39242    39242           
  Misses       6736     6736           
  Partials     1812     1812           
Flag Coverage Δ
keras 81.96% <ø> (ø)
keras-jax 65.05% <ø> (ø)
keras-numpy 60.02% <ø> (ø)
keras-tensorflow 66.03% <ø> (ø)
keras-torch 64.97% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

@google-ml-butler google-ml-butler bot added kokoro:force-run ready to pull Ready to be merged into the codebase labels Nov 20, 2024
@fchollet fchollet merged commit 495a570 into keras-team:master Nov 20, 2024
7 checks passed
@google-ml-butler google-ml-butler bot removed ready to pull Ready to be merged into the codebase kokoro:force-run labels Nov 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants