docs: close out the UserMeter expand-phase language - #1212
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 10 minutes You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughUpdated architecture documentation links to the current ChangesArchitecture documentation
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/contributing/architecture/data-storage.md`:
- Around line 1442-1444: Update the earlier paragraph near the legacy namespace
discussion to describe default-namespace access only as historical migration
behavior, or remove that claim entirely. Keep the current query contract
unambiguously limited to per-account namespaces plus the reserved builtin
namespace, while preserving the requirement that each signed-in user has fully
isolated assistant resources.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: ae0231a5-0cb4-4bd4-ab50-562e3065bab6
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
docs/contributing/architecture/data-storage.mddocs/contributing/architecture/entitlements.md
The storage, package-service, write-lease, and daily-counter contracts are complete, so retitle "UserMeter (expand phase)" to "UserMeter", fix the stale write-fencing anchor, and update the Vectorize note that still described a pending default-namespace contract read (search is namespaced-only).
2369025 to
2cf22d1
Compare
|
🔎 Preview deployed: https://kody-pr-1212.kody-a99.workers.dev Worker: Mocks:
|
2 participants
Intent
Final docs pass for the post-cutover contract program: the storage, package-service, write-lease, and daily-counter contracts are all complete, so the architecture docs should stop describing UserMeter as mid-expand.
Summary
## UserMeter (expand phase)to## UserMeterand update all nine#usermeter-expand-phaseanchors acrossentitlements.mdanddata-storage.mdTesting
npm run docs:check-temporalgreen; format green; docs-only change (CI Validate covers the rest)System recap
Conductor report
STATUS: ready pending CI. Last wave of the cleanup program.
Summary by CodeRabbit