Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Rollup merge of rust-lang#55932 - Turbo87:to_digit, r=alexcrichton
core/char: Speed up `to_digit()` for `radix <= 10` I noticed that `char::to_digit()` seemed to do a bit of extra work for handling `[a-zA-Z]` characters. Since `to_digit(10)` seems to be the most common case (at least in the `rust` codebase) I thought it might be valuable to create a fast path for that case, and according to the benchmarks that I added in one of the commits it seems to pay off. I also created another fast path for the `radix < 10` case, which also seems to have a positive effect. It is very well possible that I'm measuring something entirely unrelated though, so please verify these numbers and let me know if I missed something! ### Before ``` # Run 1 test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_10 ... bench: 16,265 ns/iter (+/- 1,774) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_16 ... bench: 13,938 ns/iter (+/- 2,479) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_2 ... bench: 13,090 ns/iter (+/- 524) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_36 ... bench: 14,236 ns/iter (+/- 1,949) # Run 2 test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_10 ... bench: 16,176 ns/iter (+/- 1,589) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_16 ... bench: 13,896 ns/iter (+/- 3,140) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_2 ... bench: 13,158 ns/iter (+/- 1,112) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_36 ... bench: 14,206 ns/iter (+/- 1,312) # Run 3 test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_10 ... bench: 16,221 ns/iter (+/- 2,423) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_16 ... bench: 14,361 ns/iter (+/- 3,926) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_2 ... bench: 13,097 ns/iter (+/- 671) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_36 ... bench: 14,388 ns/iter (+/- 1,068) ``` ### After ``` # Run 1 test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_10 ... bench: 11,521 ns/iter (+/- 552) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_16 ... bench: 12,926 ns/iter (+/- 684) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_2 ... bench: 11,266 ns/iter (+/- 1,085) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_36 ... bench: 14,213 ns/iter (+/- 614) # Run 2 test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_10 ... bench: 11,424 ns/iter (+/- 1,042) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_16 ... bench: 12,854 ns/iter (+/- 1,193) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_2 ... bench: 11,193 ns/iter (+/- 716) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_36 ... bench: 14,249 ns/iter (+/- 3,514) # Run 3 test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_10 ... bench: 11,469 ns/iter (+/- 685) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_16 ... bench: 12,852 ns/iter (+/- 568) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_2 ... bench: 11,275 ns/iter (+/- 1,356) test char::methods::bench_to_digit_radix_36 ... bench: 14,188 ns/iter (+/- 1,501) ``` I ran the benchmark using: ```sh python x.py bench src/libcore --stage 1 --keep-stage 0 --test-args "bench_to_digit" ```
- Loading branch information