Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: support crosshair base for single magnet #204

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pimlie
Copy link

@pimlie pimlie commented Jul 28, 2024

This adds support for bases with a single hole/magnet as a single N45 S-06-02-N magnet should be strong enough in most (of my) cases.

The spoke width is a parameter, but the default value of 3 seems as sturdy as the skeletonized variant and uses pretty much the same amount of filament.

image
image

@@ -48,12 +48,15 @@ fity = 0; // [-1:0.1:1]
/* [Styles] */

// baseplate styles
style_plate = 0; // [0: thin, 1:weighted, 2:skeletonized, 3: screw together, 4: screw together minimal]
style_plate = 0; // [0: thin, 1:weighted, 2:skeletonized, 3: screw together, 4: screw together minimal, 5:crosshair, 6:screw together crosshair]
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel that screw together should be a separate feature, also because I would like to use S-04-02 magnets instead of screws :)

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree, as screw together can be combined with multiple style plates.

@@ -157,13 +162,6 @@ module cutter_weight() {
}
}
}
module hole_pattern(){
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I made hole_pattern a utilility so it's moved to the utiliy.scad. The hole-pattern util is also used by bins

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants