CHG: switch to ruff format instead of black entirely

[sbrugman]

Description

Recommend ruff format instead of black
Benefits performance as well as fewer dependencies that can conflict (e.g. click)

Link to ruff's pre-commit version to avoid having to update the docs every time there is a new release, which are frequent.

Development notes

Developer Certificate of Origin

We need all contributions to comply with the Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO). All commits must be signed off by including a Signed-off-by line in the commit message. See our wiki for guidance.

If your PR is blocked due to unsigned commits, then you must follow the instructions under "Rebase the branch" on the GitHub Checks page for your PR. This will retroactively add the sign-off to all unsigned commits and allow the DCO check to pass.

Checklist

• Read the contributing guidelines
• Signed off each commit with a Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO)
• Opened this PR as a 'Draft Pull Request' if it is work-in-progress
• Updated the documentation to reflect the code changes
• Added a description of this change in the RELEASE.md file
• Added tests to cover my changes
• Checked if this change will affect Kedro-Viz, and if so, communicated that with the Viz team

[astrojuanlu]

🚀 Yes! Approving this with some nitpicks

[astrojuanlu]

#3395 is getting annoying...

[merelcht]

I really like this suggestion, but we should then also update the behaviour of our lint tool, because that still uses black. As a user I would be confused that ruff format is the recommendation in the docs, but the tool we provide has a different setup.

[sbrugman]

@merelcht Agreed, better to switch to ruff for both linting and formatting completely.
bandit is now also replaced with ruff

I found some obviated noqa comments and removed them.

It would be good to create a follow-up story that expands the selection of ruff rules, since we only use a subset of the rich library

[merelcht]

Thank you so much for switching everything to ruff format @sbrugman ⭐ I left some minor comments, but otherwise this looks good to go! 👍

I also agree on creating a follow up to leverage ruff more where we can.

[merelcht]

The tests are currently failing because the pyproject.toml files in kedro-starters need to be updated to contain all ruff setup as well.

[merelcht]

The tests are currently failing because the pyproject.toml files in kedro-starters need to be updated to contain all ruff setup as well.

Created a PR for this kedro-org/kedro-starters#207

[noklam]

🙏Appreciate your help!

[SajidAlamQB]

Added a change so that unit tests now use the main branch of kedro-starters now its only failing on coverage for thread_runner.py.