-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix GCP PodIdentity not considered with WorkloadIdentity - take 2 #5255
Fix GCP PodIdentity not considered with WorkloadIdentity - take 2 #5255
Conversation
Thank you for your contribution! 🙏 We will review your PR as soon as possible. While you are waiting, make sure to:
Learn more about: |
73bbde8
to
f759fa6
Compare
@@ -74,8 +74,10 @@ Here is an overview of all new **experimental** features: | |||
### Fixes | |||
|
|||
- **General**: Fix CVE-2023-39325 in golang.org/x/net ([#5122](https://github.com/kedacore/keda/issues/5122)) | |||
- **General**: Fix otelgrpc DoS vulnerability ([#5208](https://github.com/kedacore/keda/issues/5208)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
please keep only relevant changes here
- **General**: Prevented stuck status due to timeouts during scalers generation ([#5083](https://github.com/kedacore/keda/issues/5083)) | ||
- **Azure Pipelines**: No more HTTP 400 errors produced by poolName with spaces ([#5107](https://github.com/kedacore/keda/issues/5107)) | ||
- **GCP PubSub**: Fix GCP PodIdentity not considered with WorkloadIdentity ([#5021](https://github.com/kedacore/keda/issues/5021)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not exclusive to GCP PubSup, right? I would use GCP Scalers
prefix
hey @sammaxwellxyz, do you think you will have some availability to address comments from @zroubalik until 2.13 release which is scheduled for Jan 11? #5275 All good if not, I can take over and finish the PR so it can be merged. Just wanted to check-in with you first. |
Hi @wozniakjan , I don't expect to get this complete by Jan 11. Please do go ahead and take over :) |
all good, thanks for the great work @sammaxwellxyz and @juldrixx! I will see if I can help wrap it up. |
This can be now closed #5351 |
Provide a description of what has been changed
Checklist
When introducing a new scaler, I agree with the scaling governance policy
I have verified that my change is according to the deprecations & breaking changes policy
Tests have been added
Changelog has been updated and is aligned with our changelog requirements
A PR is opened to update our Helm chart (repo) (if applicable, ie. when deployment manifests are modified)
A PR is opened to update the documentation on (repo) (if applicable)
Commits are signed with Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO - learn more)
#5011
based on #5021
Relates to #5011