-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 382
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🌱 Fixed typos across the repository #3151
Conversation
Hi @gauravgahlot. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kcp-dev member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/ok-to-test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @gauravgahlot, thanks a lot for the contribution! I have one minor request for dropping some changes, apart from that this PR looks great and we can merge it soon.
const ( | ||
// MachineHealthCheckSuccededCondition is set on machines that have passed a healthcheck by the MachineHealthCheck controller. | ||
// MachineHealthCheckSucceededCondition is set on machines that have passed a healthcheck by the MachineHealthCheck controller. | ||
// In the event that the health check fails it will be set to False. | ||
MachineHealthCheckSuccededCondition ConditionType = "HealthCheckSucceeded" | ||
MachineHealthCheckSucceededCondition ConditionType = "HealthCheckSucceeded" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's drop those changes because they live in a third_party
directory, which means the code has been imported from some upstream project. In this case, it's CAPI (#273). We shouldn't change third party code if we can avoid it. I'm not sure if this condition is actually used anywhere in our code, probably not, but changes on our end might make it more difficult to pull upstream code again.
One more request, can you please squash your commits into one? This repository doesn't squash on merge, so let's try to keep the git log tidy. |
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Gahlot <[email protected]>
8396c79
to
21d5a28
Compare
/assign |
/retest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
thank you for the contribution!
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: fd0f3a9187ac43a4a18020e268abf9be6384179d
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: embik The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Summary
Fixes typos across the repository.
Related issue(s)
Fixes #
Release Notes