Apply avoiding IBD patch10 logic to p2p v4

[michaelsutton]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1979 (cd5f69b) into dev (2ab8065) will decrease coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

❗ Current head cd5f69b differs from pull request most recent head 085c1cc. Consider uploading reports for the commit 085c1cc to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #1979      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   57.88%   57.83%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         676      676              
  Lines       32123    32137      +14     
==========================================
- Hits        18595    18585      -10     
- Misses      10892    10912      +20     
- Partials     2636     2640       +4     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
app/protocol/flows/v4/blockrelay/ibd.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
infrastructure/network/rpcclient/rpc_get_info.go	45.45% <0.00%> (-18.19%)	⬇️
app/protocol/flows/v5/blockrelay/block_locator.go	52.94% <0.00%> (-11.77%)	⬇️
infrastructure/network/rpcclient/rpcclient.go	60.67% <0.00%> (-6.75%)	⬇️
infrastructure/network/netadapter/router/route.go	82.85% <0.00%> (-5.72%)	⬇️
.../protocol/flows/v5/blockrelay/handle_relay_invs.go	53.12% <0.00%> (+0.89%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2ab8065...085c1cc. Read the comment docs.

[elichai]

Please write a small comment explaining this logic

[michaelsutton]

I added comments. Re the general comment below, this is temp code by definition. As we already have p2p v5 which fixed precisely this issue, and p2p v4 will soon be obsolete.

[elichai]

Let's merge it as a temp fix (as it's not consensus code), and let's add details to this in the future, to make sure it's the best we can do