operator/pkg/tasks/init: unit test namespace #5635
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
karmada-bot
added
the
size/L
In this commit, we unit test the namespace init task in the operator package making sure namespace is created successfully when this task is running. Signed-off-by: Mohamed Awnallah <[email protected]>
mohamedawnallah
force-pushed
the
unitTestNamespaceInitTaskOperatorPkg
branch
from
123392a
to
2e2ebbc
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
In this commit, we unit test the namespace init task in the operator package making sure namespace is created successfully.
What type of PR is this?
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Part of #5491.
Dependency
This PR depends on #5630.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: