use UUIDs for default file ID manager implementations

[dlqqq]

Closes #3.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Base: 79.39% // Head: 79.68% // Increases project coverage by +0.28% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (c1b3411) compared to base (5f1741a).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #30      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   79.39%   79.68%   +0.28%     
==========================================
  Files           5        5              
  Lines         495      502       +7     
  Branches       68       68              
==========================================
+ Hits          393      400       +7     
  Misses         80       80              
  Partials       22       22              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
jupyter_server_fileid/manager.py	88.71% <100.00%> (+0.24%)	⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[kevin-bates]

Sorry, I'm confused. I thought @davidbrochart's PR to allow arbitrary Contents Managers had defined an ABC class named AbstractFileIdManager? But now see that is not the case. I believe there are several issues with this. Rather than attempt to reference source code that is not part of this PR, I've submitted a (late) review on #24 (where the applicable lines are still part of the PR).

[kevin-bates]

Hi @dlqqq - these changes look good relative to the conversion to UUID. Most of my comments are a carryover from the late review on #24 and assumptions made about what arbitrary fileId managers might need. I apologize for those being a bit off-topic.

Since it's clear that those are potential changes in a separate PR, I'm approving these changes relative to the conversion to UUID. We can follow up regarding my comments here or not.

Thanks for the ping.

[dlqqq]

@kevin-bates Thank you for your comments! I'm just going to go ahead and merge this for now since none of them pertain to the UUID implementation. We can keep discussing in this PR and #24 of course.

[dlqqq]

@kevin-bates Actually, let's just keep all discussion local to #24 for cleanliness. I'll copy my responses over there.