docs(wedge): PR 1.5a — Phase A craft refinements + pre-existing drift cleanup#192
Merged
Conversation
…s + §2 H10 evidence + membership-philosophy §3.3 Sponsor commit (Opus quality-review deferred items)
…ure-parity body + llms.txt:50 (€99/€79/€199 → €120 + single-SKU framing)
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
This was referenced May 17, 2026
jukka-matti
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2026
…livered agent-docs specs (#196) PR 5 of the Phase C arc. Original audit triaged 3 items for DELETE: 1. ~~architecture.md §12 Teams SDK section~~ — REMOVED FROM SCOPE: PR 3 Batch D rewrote §12 into "Teams Static Tab (Azure App)" as a current V1 reference (per final-review finding on #195). 2. agent-docs-architecture-design.md (delivered): "10 personas × 14 use cases × 3 tiers" complexity claim was pre-wedge; live USER-JOURNEYS.md was rewritten in Phase A. 3. agent-docs-architecture-phase1-foundation.md (delivered): Task 7's USER-JOURNEYS.md draft (10 personas) was pre-wedge. Both files describe a delivered architecture (5-layer model, skills, Tier 1/2 narrative split) that remains in force — line-delete would break spec coherence. Applied wedge supersession callout at top of each instead, preserving 10-persona content as historical record. Canonical persona artifact is now docs/01-vision/variscout-process/four-personas.md (named-future). Closes Phase C doc cleanup arc (PRs #191, #192, #193, #194, #195, this).
6 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Closes the deferred items from PR #191 (Phase A) review:
5 files touched, 2 commits, docs-only.
Concern A — Strategic-craft refinements
A.1 — business-bible §6 framed as decision-gates (not checklist)
Old opening "three strategic checks must clear" → new: "VariScout will not commit V1 engineering until these three gates clear. They are not a checklist — they are the bet test." §6.3 retitled "Customer validation — the bet test"; 30-minute call positioned as minimum-viable, not the standard.
A.2 — business-bible §2 H10 evidence thickened
H10 ("Single SKU Beats Tier Ladder") now cites two specific data points (Linear ARR trajectory, Plausible YoY growth) framed as "defensible patterns worth re-verifying before V1 launch" so future verifier knows what to source.
A.3 — membership-philosophy §3.3 Sponsor signoff commits the deferral
Killed "Re-evaluate in V2 if customer demand surfaces" hedge. New framing: "by design, not as a placeholder" — audit-trail + in-app Sponsor signoff explicitly assigned to VariScout Process as a product-line scope boundary, not a backlog item.
Concern B — Pre-existing drift cleanup
B.1 — docs/index.md Starlight Products table
Two-row table (Azure Standard €79 + Azure Team €199) collapsed to one row (Azure App €120 single SKU). Dev-comment lines also updated ("Azure Team App" → "Azure App").
B.2 — docs/08-products/feature-parity.md body €99 → €120
17 hits across table headers + body prose + cells. Line 14's historical retirement sentence preserves €79/€199 (it's describing the retirement, not asserting current truth).
B.3 — docs/llms.txt:50 descriptor
"PWA vs Azure Standard vs Azure Team" → "PWA (free) vs Azure App (€120/month single SKU); project-membership-role-gated features inside Azure."
Test plan
Plan + spec
Continuation of PR #191 Phase A doc completion. Spec:
docs/superpowers/specs/2026-05-17-wedge-phase-a-doc-completion-design.md.🤖 Generated with Claude Code