Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add juicefs directory quota function #2771

Closed
wants to merge 17 commits into from

Conversation

ldd91
Copy link

@ldd91 ldd91 commented Sep 16, 2022

This pr is to add directory quota for juicefs,here is our design docs: https://docs.google.com/document/d/126-Pzijf4e-XjoslS5_kVDOvwh0LFwi_Mc96Tp74Cf8/edit#

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Sep 16, 2022

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.    Quality Gate failed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 46 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
19.8% 19.8% Duplication

@ldd91 ldd91 changed the title Dir quota develop Add juicefs directory quota function Sep 16, 2022
@ldd91 ldd91 changed the title Add juicefs directory quota function add juicefs directory quota function Sep 16, 2022
@millerlogic
Copy link

Hi, thanks for this. I am confused by the description,

This command provides a faster way to actively build cache for the target files. It reads all objects of the files and then write them into local cache directory.

This is not what I think of when I hear the term quota for a file system. I think either the description needs updating, or the command should be more specific, like cachequota or cquota. Otherwise can you let me know what I'm missing?
I say this without fully knowing what this PR does, I'm just commenting my confusion. Thanks

@davies davies added this to the Release 1.1 milestone Feb 7, 2023
@davies
Copy link
Contributor

davies commented Apr 3, 2023

@ldd91 We have took over this PR with #3268, thanks for your contribution!

@davies davies closed this Apr 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants