Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: remoteAddress may be undefined #2

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

baloo
Copy link

@baloo baloo commented Dec 9, 2015

see nodejs/node#4198

test case:

var net = require('net');
var server = net.createServer(function(c) { //'connection' listener
  c.on('end', function() {
    console.log(c.remoteAddress);
    server.close();
  });
});
server.listen(8124, function() {
  var client = net.connect({port: 8124}, function(c) {
    client.end();
  });
});

Signed-off-by: Arthur Gautier [email protected]

@baloo baloo force-pushed the bugfixes/remoteAddress-undefined branch from 1f865fb to 7a12b3c Compare December 9, 2015 07:03
Arthur Gautier added 3 commits December 9, 2015 07:09
Signed-off-by: Arthur Gautier <[email protected]>
see nodejs/node#4198

test case:
``` javascript
var net = require('net');
var server = net.createServer(function(c) { //'connection' listener
  c.on('end', function() {
    console.log(c.remoteAddress);
    server.close();
  });
});
server.listen(8124, function() {
  var client = net.connect({port: 8124}, function(c) {
    client.end();
  });
});
```

Signed-off-by: Arthur Gautier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arthur Gautier <[email protected]>
@baloo baloo force-pushed the bugfixes/remoteAddress-undefined branch from 7a12b3c to c0e181d Compare December 9, 2015 07:10
@baloo
Copy link
Author

baloo commented Dec 9, 2015

Looks like github order commits by date ... please have a look there https://github.com/baloo/forwarded/commits/bugfixes/remoteAddress-undefined to get the correct view

@dougwilson
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @baloo your pull request actually introduces a security issue, as the module would allow for blind trust in possibly-forged header if the socket address is unknown. Without knowing the socket address, you can't tell if the request came from a trust source who is setting the header properly.

@baloo
Copy link
Author

baloo commented Dec 10, 2015

@dougwilson true that. my problem is actually that a client disconnect before morgan has time to successfully log the query.

When morgan executes https://github.com/expressjs/morgan/blob/master/index.js#L141 the callback is triggered on next tick by https://github.com/jshttp/on-finished/blob/master/index.js#L31 time by which the client may be disconnected (especially with a local reverse proxy and no keepalive to nodejs application).
Would you accept a PR on on-finished or morgan to make this behaviour tunable? (suggestions welcome!)

@baloo
Copy link
Author

baloo commented Dec 10, 2015

(when using combined format in morgan which lookup the client' ip)

@dougwilson
Copy link
Contributor

The bug is in Node.js itself. I remember there is a pull request that saves the address for retrieval later, so you can get the address regardless of if the socket is still connected. I recommend you need to push that pull request forward.

Another option is to use the "immediate" option in morgan or even redefine the remote-addr token to use a saved IP from your own code.

@baloo
Copy link
Author

baloo commented Dec 10, 2015

We did move to the immediate option as a workaround already. But that bypasses a lot of things, among them the status-code and response size.

@dougwilson
Copy link
Contributor

Here is the Node.js bug you should try and champion: nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#7566

Node.js maintains even say it is a confirmed bug, so you would think it would get fixed. I'm still looking for that pull request for you, but that is the main bug as far as I can tell.

As for the "immediate" option, yes, you would have to actually use two morgan instances: one records request parameters and the other records response parameters. Another option is just redefine the remote-addr token yourself and use your own method to determine the remote address (or even call Object.defineProperty to change the ip property to a value instead of a getter at the start of the request, to lock in the value).

@baloo
Copy link
Author

baloo commented Dec 10, 2015

By the way, what about a value cache for ip field in the express request ? currently the value is computed every time the value is accessed. It is not supposed to change during the request' lifetime. What do you think?

Anyway thanks for the tips and referencing the bug.

@dougwilson
Copy link
Contributor

The model Express follows is to use getters that recalculate the values on every access. This means middleware can re-write aspects of the request, like the forwarded headers, and the value will be automatically reflected in the property. Basically, the recalculation is intentional and is part of the Express design/philosophy.

@dougwilson
Copy link
Contributor

Basically, the the property does caching, it hard for people who want it not to cache (but very simple for people who want it to cache, as they just add middleware to capture and save the value, either as a new property or by redefining the property with the value). In addition, caching can bring in weird issues if it is done on-demand (if the first access of ip is after it's gone, on demand caching didn't help you) and if not done on demand, people will also complain about the unnecessary work Express is doing to calculate things they don't need and never access. Simply making the properties dynamic places all this control into the user's hands to manage, letting people define Express to be what they need, not whatever Express just happened to provide.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants