Can JoltPhysics.js replace ammo.js at present ?

[finscn]

I want to replace ammo.js with JoltPhysics.js in my web game.
But I don't know Whether current version of JoltPhysics.js covers all the functions/features of ammo.js (Bullet)

I think the native version JoltPhysics is good enough to replace Bullet.
What about JoltPhysics.js ?

[jrouwe]

I think in terms of features Jolt and Bullet are quite close. I did a quick scan through ammo.idl to see what the differences are between ammo.js and JoltPhysics.js in term of features. I think the main things that are missing are:

• Collision tests (cast ray, cast shape, collide shape and broad phase collide or as they are called in Bullet: rayTest, convexSweepTest, contactTest and contactPairTest) Done
• Custom collision groups (right now only 2 groups are exposed in the JS interface) Done
• 6DOF Constraint (all other constraints that ammo.js supports have been exposed) Done
• Vehicle support Done

Exposing these is not a lot of work as it is mostly a matter of typing the class/function names in JoltJS.idl.

[finscn]

Thanks.
I hope Jolt.js would expost these features in the feature .

[jrouwe]

I just released a version that fixes the first item.

[jrouwe]

6DOF constraint is exposed now too

[finscn]

Hi @jrouwe , Is there any plan for Custom collision groups & Vehicle support ?

[jrouwe]

Yes to both, vehicle support should be simple but I haven't decided how to expose the custom collision groups yet.

[jrouwe]

Vehicle support has been implemented, I hope to implement custom collision groups soon

[jrouwe]

And the latest release now also supports defining your own layers.