-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
Potential improvement: Importing and exporting recent changes only #81
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
@mmzmusicnotes - Thanks for reaching out! On the performance side, 10 minutes seems really long, even for a very complex database... Is that with the joyfullservice version of the add-in? I have a very complex Access ADP project that exports about a thousand objects. That takes just under a minute for a full export, and under four seconds for subsequent exports. (And most of that time is dealing with SQL objects, not database components.) I actually used to have a toolbar in the VBA IDE, but I moved away from that because I preferred the approach of a demand-loaded add-in that I could use on any database instead of needing to add code to each project to load the VCS tools. On the workflow side, I personally use GitHub Desktop alongside Access in my development work. When I am ready to make a commit, I simply run the export from the add-in, then switch over to the GitHub Desktop to review my changes, add the commit message and push the changes. It sounds like your version is much more tightly tied to git itself, whereas mine is looking at file modification dates, which also allows you to use other file-based version control systems like CVS, SVN, TFS, etc... That being said, if there is something specific that you feel would really improve the process, I would be happy to take that into consideration. 😄 |
@joyfullservice Thanks for the quick response!
It is. Here's my initial export: and subsequent: Import is similar. Clearly, my DB is much larger than yours (and arguably, larger than anyone's ever should be)!
Is that code somewhere in this repo? It would be enormously helpful to us, I think... Or, does the add-in have a way to add that functionality? I'd be happy to help get it working if so.
Our workflow is somewhat similar, but substitute Sourcetree for GitHub. The big advantage to integrating into git is that you can go both back and forward in time. For instance, suppose that I revert to an earlier commit. My code will determine the delta of changed files between the last commit I imported and that earlier reversion, and import only those files. Unless I misunderstand what you are doing (or your audit trail is much more robust than I realized), I don't think that can be done with modification dates? If you desired it, this could be available as an option - a method of deciding what to import. That way, for other source control systems you can still use file modification dates. |
Thank you for the additional background information, and the screenshots. Wow, I have never seen that many queries in a single database. 😄 It makes sense why you would be wanting to improve the export performance. As to the code for the VBA IDE toolbar, absolutely! You can browse the related code here. Specifically, you are probably wanting to see clsVbeMenu and modMenuHandler. If you would find something like this helpful in your development cycle, I would be happy to integrate a pull request into the core. (I would probably also suggest an option where you could choose whether or not to load the VBE menu.) The integration you are describing with git sounds intriguing... I would be interested in reviewing a pull request on how you would suggest integrating this into the project. As you have probably discovered, I have completely restructured the source files for this project, moving towards a more object-oriented class-based approach that can more easily be refactored and extended going forward. I love the idea of being able to combine efforts with other skilled developers on this project. The more people we have behind this project and supporting it going forward, the more all of us will benefit in the long run. 😄 |
And that's nothing - we have one DB with over 25,000 queries! (There are some good and some not-so-good reasons why things are this way, but regardless, we need to capture the current state before we can go forward.) We are also working on a continuous integration method whereby we use automated tools (e. g. TeamCity) and an autoexec script to rebuild the database from source on a build server for each development increment. That isn't up and running yet, but when it is, it will probably use a version of this tool.
Thank you! Yes, I think this would be helpful for us, especially if I integrated menu items for our "export changes", "import changes" and "[export/import] all [object type]" options.
I'd like to give that a shot. It may be a couple of weeks before I get a chance, as we've just finished this current pass of work on the system (using the structure of the original version of the plugin), but after that I can hopefully try to dig in and see how we can integrate it. |
I totally understand! It is nice to have a current state before diving into major development.
You might be interested in #51 where a couple of us were discussing some build automation using this add-in. I think this is something that would be of interest to several other Access developers as well.
Sounds great! I think you will find the code structure fairly self-explanatory, but feel free to reach out if you get stuck on something. I appreciate your interest and collaboration on this project. 😄 Hopefully the many hours of cleanup and restructuring I have spent on it will give you a jump-start on the development side as you work out issues with very large and complex databases. |
@mmzmusicnotes - As of the latest release (v3.2.1) I have implemented some additional performance tuning and logging. I am guessing that you will see noticeable improvement when exporting your databases. 😄 I am definitely interested in your idea of a "Merge Build" where the changed files are integrated into an existing database based on the date of a head commit rather than a complete rebuild each time. |
Hi @joyfullservice - thank you for your work on this! Unfortunately, the new version is crashing on this line:
I am continuing to work on our git implementation. Once I have it in a relatively stable place, I will put it up on GitHub as a starting point, and then we can discuss integrating those changes here. |
Is the error on the export or the import? Sounds like maybe a quick fix... |
Sorry, I should have specified - on the export. |
Could you post a screenshot of the error message? Also, if you click |
Nice! At the bottom of the log file, you should see some performance reports... I would be interested in seeing how those come out for your database... 😄 |
Here's what I've got:
If we can improve the performance of query/table export, that would be the biggest bang for the buck from my perspective. |
Thanks! That is helpful to see. As you may have seen, the two tables are basically two perspectives of the same export. The top table is by object type, and the bottom table is by process. The totals are roughly similar, but will have some expected variation based on the timing precision and other overhead details. Based on my performance tuning development last week, here is my analysis: Of this, about 70% is internal processes that we really can't speed up any further. (Such as Access actually serializing the object and writing it to a file.) I am encouraged to see that we are getting some really nice performance, even on a large and complex database. Going forward, the biggest performance gains will obviously be in refining the selective export/import of objects. P.S. I would also be curious to see the performance reports on a subsequent export using Fast Save. I am thinking that you should see some significant improvements there as well. |
Subsequent fast save, as you suspect, is much faster: For workflows where most work is edited in Access, this is more than sufficient, I think, provided you don't have to export too frequently. We like to edit in VS code, though, where possible - it has many features the Access editor doesn't have, such as changing all references, searching globally for all references, and so on. We import into Access (using my git-based One thing I wonder is whether or even using a query-execution approach: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17272945/exporting-a-query-result-into-a-text-file-using-vba-ms-access This of course is referring specifically to tables and queries, which are the long-tail in my databases. Without knowing what |
@mmzmusicnotes - Thanks for the additional background on your workflow process. I will look forward to learning how you are interacting with Git and determining the changed files and such. Ultimately I believe this is going to be the missing link to fast and efficient merging of changes into a working database. In terms of raw speed, the undocumented In regards to other functions to export database objects, I am familiar with those approaches you mentioned. They are for exporting the data stored in a database, as compared to the object definitions themselves. Based on my experience with this add-on and others like it, the |
That makes sense - thank you. I'm going to speak with my colleagues today about getting some of our git integration back out into a repo for you to take a look at. Not sure what form it'll take, but hopefully will be able to put it up soon. Thanks again for your help! |
@mmzmusicnotes, I'm just popping in to say that the RubberDuck may make working in the VBE more attractive than VSCode: Their ultimate goal is to replace the code window in the VBE with AvalonEdit but that is a long term goal. For now, it has some amazing refactoring and code inspection tools that I use every day. |
@A9G-Data-Droid Hey, thanks for stopping by. Yes, we've tried Rubberduck - it tries to chew through our code and pretty much dies. It's not usable, just much too slow to do anything, and crashes frequently. Doubtless it would be less painful in a DB of smaller size... though if you have any ideas on optimizations that would make it usable, I'd be interested. @joyfullservice since I am here, an update - I got the go-ahead to get my code uploaded to Github. We are working on our CI pipeline and that's revealed a few bugs in our implementation I'd like to get resolved. Regardless of that, though, I will put up what I have before the end of the month. Just hoping a little extra time will further improve the state of things. |
@joyfullservice to get us started, I went ahead and threw up the current state of things here: https://github.com/mmzmusicnotes/msaccess-vcsintegration-gitsupport I'm sorry that this does not have the history from the original repo, and is thus not a true fork. I moved it into our internal source control, and there was not a clean way for me to set that up. I spent a little time trying to rebase it off the original repo, but that turned out to be a pain - and as I said, this is just a proof-of-concept. The parts to look at are the I think if we wanted to integrate this work here, we would want to be much more circumspect about architecture. I threw this together and it is fairly fragile (as the original plugin was). Obviously, the git stuff could all be contained in a class that handles git operations. We'd also want to do a better job of managing tags (right now, users have to manually create the Finally, there's some challenges with export - when you export your changes, it may include changes that were last imported from git, because export has to go by date of modification, and you must always export all modules, because I have not found a reliable way to ascertain when a module was modified. I also don't yet have a good way to notify git that a module was renamed or delete within Access itself - but as I mentioned, this is not a super high priority for us as we mostly work in VS Code/the filesystem, and then import the changes into Access. The UI is also worth discussing. If this is presented as a setting or option, then it could change the import/export behavior accordingly. It might be better, though, to have it as an entirely different set of operations - e. g. a "Sync with git" button that exports any changes made in Access, and imports any changes made in git, and updates the tagged commit. You could even provide a list of commits and choose visually which one to import changes starting from (by moving the tag). I hope this is helpful! |
@mmzmusicnotes - Thanks for uploading a copy of your project! This was exactly what I needed to be able to see how you were interacting with git. I like your technique of reading the I agree with your suggestion of using a dedicated class for the git interaction. Perhaps I think the bigger question is going to be how we work out the overall workflow and development cycle. We need to consider files that may have changed in the following areas:
Obviously the most important thing here is that a user does not inadvertently overwrite their changes and lose work. Any time changes are overwritten from one source to another, there needs to be an intentional decision on the part of the user as to which changes are preserved. After some consideration here, I would like to propose the following approach for managing the changes, then outline what this looks like from a workflow perspective in some different development scenarios. This would be the behavior with the git integration functionality turned on. A guiding principle here is that we are using GitHub Desktop, SourceTree, or other git management tool to handle commits, pushes and pulls to the remote repository. Export Source:
Merge Build:
Use Cases:Primary Development in Microsoft Access Collaborative Development in Microsoft Access Primary Development in Source Files After reviewing this in more detail, I would suggest that we take the following plan of action towards integrating this into the core.
While this takes a little more planning and thought at the beginning, I believe it will give us the best quality product in the end, help minimize surprises and reduce the potential of developers losing work when something doesn't function as expected. What do you think? Do you like this approach? |
Apologies for the delay on looking at this - want to make sure I give it complete thoughts. In general, I like all of the goals you've laid out, but I want to take an iterative approach in terms of getting the functionality into the plugin. More advanced work around resolving conflicts, etc., I think we should set a specific policy on to start, and then add more complex functionality after we've built the basics out if needed. For instance, if there's a change conflict - the exported/imported file/object changed and the target file/object also changed after the last import/export date - I think for now we just alert the user and let them choose which version to keep (or to skip the file). Likewise, I appreciate the defensive approach as far as avoiding file overwrites, but I want to give the user the power to choose the "dangerous" option as long as they know they're doing it. For instance, in this scenario:
I would say that an alert and the option to proceed would be preferable.
This sounds like a great idea, similar to what I've done for import.
Agreed; this can be achieved on git's end via .gitignore. In access we'll obviously have to do it explicitly. We should also ignore any local settings the add-in may save, as different users may want different things. A couple of minor notes as well:
So long as we use git diff to do this, I agree. Also, there's a unique issue I've run into with import/export that we should be aware of. If you import changes, then export immediately, Access will see the modification date as being when the import happened, and will thus flag those changes to be exported. We can get around this by updating the json on both import and export, as I think you intend? Lastly, with regards to how we turn this functionality on and off - what were you thinking? This is a fairly big feature, so maybe we want some way of making it clear what you lose if you disable it? |
Thank you for the feedback and thoughtful replies! I feel like we are both on the same page, just working through the finer details as we move towards implementing this enhancement. I have added some replies to your comments below:
Sure, that sounds fine to me. Practically speaking we could probably do a scan first, then present the user with a single question rather than individual message boxes for each file affected. (Just in case there are hundreds or thousands of changed files.) It starts to sounds a bit complicated when we present a list of files and manage what to do with each of them. (It makes me think of a SyncBack confirmation screen.) But like you said, if we start with the basics, we can build from there as needed.
Good idea. We could add this as an option, kind of like you have with SSMS where you can allow more dangerous queries to run if you enable the option. We might have this off or set to prompt by default, but it could be set to overwrite.
I am not sure I was quite following how this would be done in .gitignore... I know you can ignore whole files, but not easily ignore specific lines or parts of files. The way my plugin does it for the json files is that it compares the content of the json file and only rewrites the file if the content section changed. See the source code here. The VCS version can be important in the future if the structure of the file changes between VCS versions, and we need to transform the source content before importing. But we don't really need to update the version numbers in every json file every time we upgrade VCS. (That was the thought process behind this approach.) Do you have some specific examples of local things that we would not want saved in VCS that are currently being saved? I have functionality for localizing relative paths, and also some handling of the printer options to help minimize this type of issue. The VCS options are saved with the project in the export folder, so other users working on the same project should be utilizing the same options and getting the same output.
Yes, this additional state catalog will allow us to more accurately determine when changes happen outside the export/import processes. I found some interesting posts regarding how git determines which files have changed, but git is obviously only comparing the source file to the git head version, and doesn't know anything about the modified date of an internal database component.
Yes, initially I was looking at having this option available, but off by default. When you check the box for Initially, the add-in would continue to function using the file-date based approach for Fast Save, but as the git integration matures, this may eventually become the default option, with the other still available as a fallback for those using other systems for version control. |
@mmzmusicnotes - I have created a new branch and began some initial implementation with the git integration. You can follow the changes and contribute on the git-integration branch. Since this involves some more significant refactoring, I thought it would be best to do the main development in the feature branch, then once it is working pretty well, we can merge it in with the master branch. I plan to pick this up again on Monday, and hope to make some good progress on it next week. 😄 @Indigo744 - You might be interested to follow this development as well, and potentially contribute if you are interested... When finished, it should significantly improve the performance of exporting and importing changes with git repositories. |
@joyfullservice That sounds great. I will have fuller responses to your comments on Monday as well - just wanted to add one other thing I forgot to mention: It would be nice, for my team's uses, if we could have access to the VCS window or some shortcuts to export and merge changes in the VBA editor itself. I think that can be a separate issue - in fact, I would encourage us starting Monday to chunk this work up into several issues under a Git integration "epic" of sorts, so we can each work on portions - but would you be willing to have that in the plugin if I provided it/included it as something optional? |
@mmzmusicnotes - Sure! I would be happy to include an option for a custom VBE menu. I can totally understand how that would be useful in your workflow. I like your idea of breaking this out into chunks so we can better collaborate on the project. I have never used the GitHub Projects feature, but it looks like it might work nicely for something like this. I just set up a basic project for us to use as we work through the integration. |
@joyfullservice thank you for pinging me. I was following this thread and was interested in the initial improvements. And by the way I want to thank you and @mmzmusicnotes for the work! I'm less interested in the advanced git integration, but that said I'll continue to follow the development and contribute if an opportunity arise. Good luck with your endeavour! |
On VCS Version: Instead of storing the version in every file exported, would it make sense to only output the VCS version in one place. I believe that it should be tracked in source control and not ignored but it shouldn't update every file to track this information. I know there could be problems with files that are exported from mixed versions but backwards compatibility will become critical as you embark on this journey. Changes will have to be planned carefully and tested to make sure it works. You could start with a version and say that you support every version from that one forwards. |
@A9G-Data-Droid - Thanks for chiming in! I appreciate your input.
Thinking about this more, perhaps a better approach would be to make the distinction between the version of the VCS software, and the version of the file format. The VCS version represents which features have been added and which bugs have been fixed. The file format version represents how the file contents are organized, and would only change when we make a (breaking) change in how the data is stored. Taking this approach, the file format version would very rarely change, and when it does, we would fill out the The name of this property is important because we don't want any confusion about what it means. It is not the VCS add-in version, it is not the version of the database or the object in the database, it is not the version in git, or the version of the source class. Does Perhaps we don't even need this element at all until we have a breaking change from the present version. This could be passed as an optional parameter to the The ultimate goal is that you could drag and drop source files from other projects, exported at different times from various versions of VCS, into a new project, build from source, and have everything load in correctly, regardless of which version was used to export the source. |
@joyfullservice That's a great solution. I would call it "Export File Format" because it's specific to the Export/Import process. Import versions can then cite compatibility with certain Export File Format Versions. There could even be a test method that keeps one of each version example file and certifies compatibility with each Export Version. |
Rather than saving the VCS version in every json file, we are now only saving an `Export File Format` version number if a format change involves a breaking change. This should reduce change noise when upgrading VCS versions. See discussion in #81
Hi all. Here are the issues I would recommend we create as thin slices for this project. The following I'd call "MVP", in the sense that we couldn't call the feature working without them:
and then these I'd call nice-to-haves which can be done subsequently:
How does this sound as a starting point? @joyfullservice , if it works for you, and you are comfortable giving me the appropriate permissions, I can try to create these and hook them up to the project board. (Or I can create them, and you can do the project setup.) |
@mmzmusicnotes - Sounds great! I think you should have permissions to edit the project now, so feel free to set up these items. |
@joyfullservice I don't seem to be able to add or edit cards, or to update the projects or labels for issues, unfortunately. I am creating the issues now, though, starting with #100. |
@mmzmusicnotes - Thanks! It looks like the invite is still pending... Maybe see if the email landed in your spam folder? I have been making some good progress today in some of the initial integration. I will plan to push out an update soon so you can see how things are coming together. |
Ahh yes, it fell into a different folder. I have what I need now. Will have each of those issues created tonight, and obviously we can refine their requirements as I go. Happy Thanksgiving! |
@joyfullservice I've created all the issues I listed above and fleshed them out as best I can. I also set up mvp and post-mvp labels so we can prioritize individual issues. Finally, I set up an automatic trigger for the project so that issues added to it go to "to-do" to be prioritized, and I added a "review" column for work awaiting approval/merge. I know this issue chain is getting chatty - if you would prefer to email me privately to coordinate issues and other things that fall outside of the scope of this particular thread, my email is on my profile. |
@mmzmusicnotes - Sounds great! Thanks for your help in organizing this project. I am thinking that we can probably close this issue since we have completed the original objective of determining that yes, we would like to move forward with a tighter git integration and the related performance improvements. 😄 |
For future reference, I am moving the wiki page of specifications to this issue. (I don't have a way to hide the wiki page, and this isn't a feature that is on the roadmap for further development at this time.) If we decide to pick this up again in the future, we can move this back to a wiki page with the other documentation pages. NOTE: New Feature Under DevelopmentIf you are using this add-in with a Because this tighter integration can result in files being overwritten or replaced, it is very important that you understand how to use this functionality works. SPECIFICATIONThis outlines the intended functionality of the software in regards to the Export and Import of source files with the Advanced Git Integration option turned on. A guiding principle here is that we are using GitHub Desktop, SourceTree, or other git management tool to handle commits, pushes and pulls to the remote repository. Export Source:
Merge Build:
Use Cases:Primary Development in Microsoft Access Collaborative Development in Microsoft Access Primary Development in Source Files This PRELIMINARY specification was last updated November 18, 2020 |
* Updating clsPerformance, as some objects never restart timing, and when resetting some objects are not cleared. Fixes joyfullservice#331 * Fixing Private/Public declarations. * This isn't actually used. * Bump Version * Update API examples Removed dependency on an external function, and added an example for building from source. * Refine some dialect-specific SQL string quotations Backticks only apply to MySQL, while square brackets are used with MSSQL and Access. joyfullservice#442 * Allow wrapping of long names in performance class Extending the performance class to allow the wrapping of long names used for categories or operations. (Not really needed within this project, but could potentially be helpful in the future with translations.) joyfullservice#441 * Update based on feedback from @joyfullservice. * Resolve conflict with upstream file Putting the comma after the argument seems to be the preferred industry-standard approach, based on ChatGPT and Bard. * Add option to pass path to build API You can now specify the source files path when you initiate a build through the API. This allows automated builds to be run even if a copy of the database does not yet exist. (Such as after checking out a project in an automated CI workflow.) joyfullservice#430 * The logic for checking of existence of git files wasn't always working as expected due to searching the current directory rather than using the export folder. * Add a check when loading XML and verify it was successfully parsed. This avoid generating a bad export where the data are not actually exported due to invalid XML being generated by Application.ExportXML. Unfortunately, if a table contains any characters that aren't valid for XML document, it won't try to escape them and include them as literals. Even if they were escaped, they might not be accepted anyway. XML specifications forbids having any characters in 0x01-0x31 range so if a table data contains such characters, this can cause the XML export to fail. In this case, tab delimited will have to be used instead. However, the previous version was simply silently exporting as if everything is hunky-dory when it's not. Hence, the error. * The export log was littered with bunch of warnings about unclosed blocks. This seems to be due to not closing it when evaluating the UseTheme. Even if we skipped it, we still need to remove it from m_colBlocks to balance everything out. * Fix a subscript out of range error where the tokens advance beyond the end of the string but the function GetNextTokenID returns 0, which then fails within FormatSQL function since there is no member at index 0. It's not clear why this only fails every second time a query is exported but it is the case where if it fails, exporting it next time will not yield the error. Do it 3rd time, then it fails. * Add more types of queries that should not be formatted by SQL formatter because they are a variant of pass-through queries. * The AutoClose may run after the form has closed (e.g. if the user is quick to close it) which may result in an error about object members not available. Since the form is closed, there's no point in setting the timer interval. To avoid the error when debugging, we add a IsLoaded check and skip it if it's not loaded. * Fix issue with LogUnhandledErrors and simplify use. (joyfullservice#449) * Add option to SplitLayoutFromVBA This option (on by default) will save the VBA code from forms and reports as a related .cls file. (Still under development.) joyfullservice#378 Also removed the "Strip out Publish Option" from the options form. I have never heard of a case where this needs to be changed, and it frees up space for the new option we are adding without cluttering the form. * Refactor code module export to shared function This logic will be shared when exporting code modules from forms and reports. * Support "|" in performance log entry names Refactored parsing the key from the performance item so that we are not dependent upon a unique delimiter. The timing value is always a number, so we can be confident that the first pipe character is the delimiter. The text after that can be anything, including pipe characters. joyfullservice#450 * Adjust indenting (minor change) * Convert Sanitize module to class In some cases sanitizing a source file actually creates two distinct outputs. A layout file and a code file. Rather than making the sanitize function more complicated with byref outputs and non-obvious side effects, I am taking the approach of a more explicit object-oriented route where the code is easier to understand and maintain. (And also allows for future enhancements such as SQL extraction for query definition files.) * Refactor sanitizing to use class Updating the existing code to use the new class. * Refactor class variables * Refactor form/report export to split VBA Export is now splitting the VBA from Form and Report objects to separate files with a .cls extension. Moving on to the code that will stitch these files back together before import. * Rename Sanitize class to SourceParser This better reflects the expanded role of the class. * Refactor for name change * Verify ribbon active state when the add-in loads Ensure that the ribbon is active when installing or activating the add-in. See joyfullservice#451 * Don't auto split layout/VBA for existing projects For existing projects in git repositories, form and report layouts should not be automatically split from the VBA code classes. There is another process that will allow us to split the files while preserving history in both files, but this involves a couple commits and requires a clean branch. For existing projects, this is a manual upgrade (option changes). For new projects, it can happen by default. * Move print settings processing to clsSourceParser This keeps the LoadComponentFromText function cleaner and easier to read. * Move source reading function This is used in several areas, and allows us to maintain the source file encoding determination in a single location. * Rework merging source content before import Cleaning this up to avoid reading and writing the file additional times while merging content from different sources. (Print settings, VBA code) * Add support to overlay VBA code after import For some (rare) situations, it is necessary to push the VBA code directly using VBE to preserve certain extended characters that may be corrupted in a regular round-trip export/import cycle. * Code cleanup and minor tweaks * Fix bugs in build logic Uncovered these while testing. * Check for diff tool before comparing objects * Implement correction according to rubberduck (joyfullservice#453) replace VBA commands: format with format$ trim with trim$ * Add wiki page for Split Files Describes the process in a little more detail. * Add change hook for options Used for special processing when certain options change. * Automate splitting forms and reports Adds a link and some code automation to split forms and reports in existing projects to layout and class files. * Rename function Git.Installed sounds better than Git.GitInstalled, and will almost always be called in the context of the git class. * Fixes joyfullservice#354 and Fixes joyfullservice#452 (joyfullservice#454) From @hecon5: Bump version minor number because it's not clear that the index will allow round trip from prior types in all cases; it worked on my machine, but that may not always be the case. The date types for the index are handled natively by modJsonConverter and should import/export correctly regardless of user's date / time zone or date encoding on machines. * Add performance timing to ISO date parsing See joyfullservice#354 * Add high-performance wrapper functions Avoids the use of RegEx when it is not necessary to parse a standard date format. joyfullservice#354 * Fix copy-paste oversight joyfullservice#354 * Update error handling Refactored a number of locations to use the new syntax for On Error Resume Next, and added code to clear expected errors. * Use faster date parsing for date only values * Add Split Files utility to ribbon (Advanced Tools) Also added an informational message box when the split is complete. * Rename as new files * Restore original files * Split layout from VBA in testing database Separates the VBA code from the layout definition in the source files. (Applying to testing database now, will apply to main project soon.) * Adjust version number I am using the minor version number to represent releases from the main branch, and the build number to continuously increment during the development cycle. * Revert the ConvDateUTC and ConvTimeUTC functions to always parse the "Fast" way first and revert otherwise. this allows the optimization to be used everywhere with no code changes. Ensure that millisecond accuracy is kept for otherse using the function. No Speed impact is noted on my end to doing this. * Pass by ref so we don't need to build more memory use. Optimize Offset string building to only do math when it's required and fix whitespace. * Cache the format types instead of needing to build them every time. * Bump Version * Verify consistent naming and byref passing of strings * Implement dialect in SQL formatting This was previously only partially implemented. joyfullservice#457 * Add support for ! boundary character This character is used in Microsoft Access in a query when referring directly to a control on a form, and should be treated similar to a period as a separator between elements. joyfullservice#457 * Add SQL formatting query to testing database This query demonstrates that we can properly parse and format expressions that refer to controls. joyfullservice#457 * Solve rare edge case with SQL IN clause Just in case a user has an embedded unquoted path in a string, the colon will be treated as a non-spaced boundary character during formatting. (For Microsoft Access SQL only) Fixes joyfullservice#447 * Addresses joyfullservice#459 (joyfullservice#460) Addresses joyfullservice#459 * Allow sort of operationames with leading spaces (joyfullservice#463) If a operationname has a leading space (like " MyOperation" ) the function "SortItemsByTime" fails. Now sorting will success. * Update comment After removing string padding in the previous commit. * Adjust detection of system tables Switching to just using a bit flag check to solve joyfullservice#462 * Log warning for UNC path access errors Failing to convert a path to UNC may not prevent the operation from completing, but it should be handled and logged. Fixes joyfullservice#461 * Refactor date conversion for DB Properties Save custom date properties in ISO (UTC) format in source files, without converting other property types like strings that may parse as dates. joyfullservice#459 * Turn off date ISO conversion by default This is only used in the index and certain database properties. joyfullservice#459 * Turn on date ISO conversion before reading index These dates need to be converted to local dates for internal processing. joyfullservice#459 * Add saved date property to testing database Verifies that the round trip conversion of saved date properties is working correctly. (The dates are stored as UTC in source files, but converted to local dates when imported into the database properties.) joyfullservice#459 * Add dates stored as text to testing database One stored as a regular date string, and the other as an ISO8601 string. (Neither should convert when reading or writing to JSON.) joyfullservice#459 * Add default git files if dbs in repository root If you use the default options of no special export folder path defined, the project may likely be in the repository root. Add the default .gitignore and .gitattributes files if they are missing. (This would be the default setup for most projects.) * Add note about Access 2007 support See joyfullservice#464 * Add test for Public Creatable class instance This is an undocumented property value that is sometimes used in the wild. Currently when you build from source, PublicCreatable (5) classes are converted to PublicNotCreatable (2). This instancing property can be set in VBA, and we want the imported class to match what was exported. This test currently fails, but will pass when the add-in is updated to support this property. * Support for PublicCreatable instancing for classes This (technically undocumented) technique allows class objects to be created by external projects without using factory methods. This approach was used in some of my projects, so it was important for me to see this property correctly set when the application was built from source. * Check VCS version before export Checks the VCS version before export to warn the user if we are running an export with an older version of VCS than was last used on this project. joyfullservice#465 * Check VCS version on build Check the VCS version before building, and warn if the project version is greater than the installed version. joyfullservice#465 * Reset error break mode after loading options The ability to break and debug VBA errors is dependent on an option value that is saved with each project. The on error directive should be reset after loading the project options to ensure that we can successfully break on errors. * Include name prefix with VBA code overlay Testing this on a machine using the Unicode BETA option in Windows. * Resolve build path during options upgrade We may not have a database open when upgrading options. Fall back to the path used to load the project options to determine the source file path. joyfullservice#467 * Add some documentation for merge build Taking some time to document the intended behavior of the merge build functionality as we work through some bugs. joyfullservice#471, joyfullservice#81 * Update Merge-Build.md Expand table of expected behavior. * Remove git integration for getting modified source I don't think this is actually being used in the wild, and it simplifies the process to have only a single code path for detecting changed source files. * Add missing database objects on merge If a source file exists, but no matching database object exists, we should merge the source file into the database. joyfullservice#471 * Fix SQL export of non-formatted queries Pass-through queries are now exported as SQL again. * Refactor source modified date for multiple files Some types of components, such as tables, forms, reports, queries, and shared images may use multiple source files to represent a single database component. We may need to check all of the related source files to accurately determine the latest modification date. * Log performance of clearing files by extension * Refactor components to provide file extension list Parent functionality such as determining the most recent file modified, getting the last modified date, and checking for alternate source files is better done by having the class provide the list of file extensions that might be used by the class, and having single external functions perform these tasks. (Avoids some redundant code.) * Add multi-file support to file properties hash This will allow us to more accurately detect changes in non-primary source files. (Such as a change in a shared image.) * Simplify component class Removing three functions that are not uniquely specific to each component type and are handled by external functions now that we have exposed the source code file extensions. * Remove Upgrade function on IDbComponent We don't need to try to support mixes of various versions of export files. Use the same version of VCS to build a fresh copy of the project, then export with the latest VCS to upgrade source file. * Move logic to clear legacy files Moving this to the Export function. * Rework processing of conflicts & orphaned objects Refactored the detection and processing of source conflicts and orphaned source files & database objects to better handle source file types that involve multiple files. joyfullservice#473 joyfullservice#471 joyfullservice#472 * Compare source contents of related files When checking for changes in source files, we need to check all the related source files for each component, not just the primary source file. * Adapt export comparison to support multiple files Further changes to compare all related source files. * Update testing database Updated to latest version of VCS. * Include class instancing in code module hash Class modules have an instancing property that needs to be checked for changes along with the VBA code to ensure that the database object matches the last export. A module will now be flagged as changed if the instancing property is changed. * Trap any XML import errors * Add alternate XML format function for big files Large XML files may cause memory errors with XSLT operations. Adding an alternate approach to simply replace the leading tabs with two spaces. This should allow the add-in to export even extremely large table data files as formatted XML. joyfullservice#389, fixes joyfullservice#474 * Remove format version from custom groups Any recent version of export file should be using the new format, and we don't need to carry this conversion forward into v4. * Fix issue with orphaned file detection Need to pass a dictionary, not a collection to the CompareToIndex function. * Move testing code to testing module * Require hash on index update Any update to the index is now required to provide a hash to match the source file. joyfullservice#472 * Save schema filter rules as collection Saving each filter line as a single element in a collection makes a much more readable section in the options.json file, especially when the rules become more complex. Previously this was saved as a combined string value which makes it harder to read changes to individual rules. * Support AfterBuild hooks in add-in project Made a tweak so we can use the RunAfterBuild hook in the add-in project to verify (load) the resources immediately after building from source. This will help prevent accidentally deploying the add-in without the needed resource records, as happened in joyfullservice#477. * Rename as new files * Restore original files * Split forms from VBA code in add-in project Going forward, this will allow us to edit the VBA code without affecting the layout definition files in forms. * Add region support type double (joyfullservice#481) Co-authored-by: Festiis <[email protected]> * Add some additional comments to code changes Clarifies why we are using the Val() function when parsing ISO dates. * Add initial support for CommandBar popup menus This is still a work in progress, but has the basic functionality of exporting and importing custom CommandBars. * Add error handling to linked table refresh This could be related to a recent Access bug, but it is helpful to trap the error if it occurs. joyfullservice#484 --------- Co-authored-by: Hecon5 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: joyfullservice <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: bclothier <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tanarri <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Festim Nuredini <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Festiis <[email protected]>
Hi @joyfullservice,
I've done some work recently on the original branch of this project which I think you might find valuable. In short, I implemented the following:
access-vcs-last-imported-commit
(this tag is applied and moved the import process, and should not be pushed)Essentially, the goal is to make the process as fast as possible by only importing/exporting objects which are likely to have changed. Even with fast save, some of our databases take upwards of 10 minutes to export, and nearly a minute subsequently. These changes make it take less than half of that; combined with your faster save, I think it would cut things down to be nearly instant.
Once that's working, it would make sense to have a button or command that can just do a quick update of that kind, rather than going all the way through the export/build UI (which is lovely, but takes many clicks). That button-press would then become a normal part of the git workflow - export, commit, push; fetch, pull, import.
I did all this before I knew about your approach, otherwise, I would have started from your code instead, as it seems to do quite a bit more, and more quickly. We use the plugin through the immediate window; it would be nice to have a way to access this that was integrated more completely into the VBA editor (rather than either typing into the immediate window or having to go to Addins and open the UI, configure it, etc).
If you are interested in integrating this work into your project, I would be happy to help you get this working in your add-in.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: