feat: add early-bound entity classes for system entities (#56)#109

Merged

joshsmithxrm merged 3 commits into

mainfrom

claude/review-sdk-issue-56-3sfGl

Jan 3, 2026

GitHub Advanced Security / CodeQL succeeded Jan 3, 2026 in 3s

12 new alerts

New alerts in code changed by this pull request

12 notes

Alerts not introduced by this pull request might have been detected because the code changes were too large.

See annotations below for details.

View all branch alerts.

Annotations

Check notice on line 565 in src/PPDS.Dataverse/Generated/Entities/asyncoperation.cs

Code scanning / CodeQL

Missed ternary opportunity Note

Both branches of this 'if' statement write to the same variable - consider using '?' to express intent better.

Check notice on line 193 in src/PPDS.Dataverse/Generated/Entities/importjob.cs

Code scanning / CodeQL

Missed ternary opportunity Note

Both branches of this 'if' statement write to the same variable - consider using '?' to express intent better.

Check notice on line 582 in src/PPDS.Dataverse/Generated/Entities/pluginassembly.cs

Code scanning / CodeQL

Missed ternary opportunity Note

Both branches of this 'if' statement write to the same variable - consider using '?' to express intent better.

Check notice on line 427 in src/PPDS.Dataverse/Generated/Entities/pluginpackage.cs

Code scanning / CodeQL

Missed ternary opportunity Note

Both branches of this 'if' statement write to the same variable - consider using '?' to express intent better.

Check notice on line 414 in src/PPDS.Dataverse/Generated/Entities/plugintype.cs

Code scanning / CodeQL

Missed ternary opportunity Note

Both branches of this 'if' statement write to the same variable - consider using '?' to express intent better.

Check notice on line 1218 in src/PPDS.Dataverse/Generated/Entities/publisher.cs

Code scanning / CodeQL

Missed ternary opportunity Note

Both branches of this 'if' statement write to the same variable - consider using '?' to express intent better.

Check notice on line 445 in src/PPDS.Dataverse/Generated/Entities/sdkmessage.cs

Code scanning / CodeQL

Missed ternary opportunity Note

Both branches of this 'if' statement write to the same variable - consider using '?' to express intent better.

Check notice on line 363 in src/PPDS.Dataverse/Generated/Entities/sdkmessagefilter.cs

Code scanning / CodeQL

Missed ternary opportunity Note

Both branches of this 'if' statement write to the same variable - consider using '?' to express intent better.

Check notice on line 832 in src/PPDS.Dataverse/Generated/Entities/sdkmessageprocessingstep.cs

Code scanning / CodeQL

Missed ternary opportunity Note

Both branches of this 'if' statement write to the same variable - consider using '?' to express intent better.

Check notice on line 443 in src/PPDS.Dataverse/Generated/Entities/sdkmessageprocessingstepimage.cs

Code scanning / CodeQL

Missed ternary opportunity Note

Both branches of this 'if' statement write to the same variable - consider using '?' to express intent better.

Check notice on line 444 in src/PPDS.Dataverse/Generated/Entities/solution.cs

Code scanning / CodeQL

Missed ternary opportunity Note

Both branches of this 'if' statement write to the same variable - consider using '?' to express intent better.

Check notice on line 2509 in src/PPDS.Dataverse/Generated/Entities/systemuser.cs

Code scanning / CodeQL

Missed ternary opportunity Note

Both branches of this 'if' statement write to the same variable - consider using '?' to express intent better.