[4.0] [RFC] Custom select Icons instead of SVGs#28787
[4.0] [RFC] Custom select Icons instead of SVGs#28787astridx wants to merge 12 commits intojoomla:4.0-devfrom
Conversation
administrator/components/com_modules/layouts/joomla/form/field/modulespositionedit.php
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
As far as I remember we tried to get rid of icon fonts in favour of svg ... not sure |
|
So all |
svg are a pity to cope with, specially as background as we can't modify the color except if we create other svgs. |
|
What about the frontend? It should not be dependent of fontawesome. |
|
I just resolved a conflict in this draft. I became aware of the topic again. I think we just need a decision here. Otherwise, a contributor will do something that someone else will undo because he likes something else ... These solutions are in my opinion technically better than this draft: I made this draft because I think the solution in the draft is easier. Sometimes this is also advantageous (#28787 (comment)).
Thank you for your feedback. You sure know more than I do. I wonder why you yourself continue to work with icon fonts instead of proposing a solution with SVGs: https://github.com/joomla/joomla-cms/pull/29016/files
You're right. Thank you Quy. But this draft is only about Atum, i.e. the backend.
Yes. But in the case of https://github.com/jshjohnson/Choices, an already existing div is used. |
But why do it differently on the backend and frontend for the same thing? |
|
My solution is not a good one. I'm closing this here. #28673 is not solved and should be reopened. |
Draft as basis for a discussion because of #28680 (comment) and #28755 (comment) .
(alternative for #28755 and #28680).
Also see:#28673
Summary of Changes
I implemented an idea of how we can use an Icon Font instead of SVGs
Testing Instructions
At the moment this is a RFC.
Basically I prefer SVGs. But I think that the maintenance in an open source project with an icon font is easier.