-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 349
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cli: Refactor out get_fetch_remotes
into git_util.rs
#4768
Open
essiene
wants to merge
1
commit into
main
Choose a base branch
from
essiene/pmwupzxmwsqz
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, we can't use the original
args.fetch
? That makesargs.fetch
useless..There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe
FetchRemoteArgs
can be extracted instead of all-inFetchArgs
, but I'm not pretty sure if that makes sense. Sorry for the noise.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No worries at all, I may have jumped the gun on the Refactor before finalizing how it will be used. For
sync
it turns out we need to fetch all branches for all configured remotes[1], so the help text will be different after all, and I don't need to flatten them in. I've reverted that last change, back to just passing FetchArgs{} around with branch, remotes and all_remotes as the fields.[1] - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K4j1xQPFxtINhyOyKuCMTZ_iNrw8g-5_giBFMGoLjaI/edit?tab=t.0#bookmark=id.y91cr92o9czf
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's not add
branch
to the args struct then. It doesn't make sense to passbranch
in toget_fetch_remotes()
, andall_remotes
togit_fetch()
.It might also be simpler to just make both
get_all_remotes()
andget_default_fetch_remotes()
public.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So I think I finally have something that looks descent:
git_fetch
takesFetchArgs
; which only has fields forbranch
andremotes
. This is useful since FetchArgs disambiguated the fields and makes it easier to know what goes where.get_fetch_remotes
doesn't needFetchArgs
and sinceremotes
andall_remotes
are different types completely, it doesn't look terrible if I just pass them in directlywdyt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems okay.
FWIW, I wonder if
git_fetch()
can actually be reused in "git sync". Suppose "git sync" does rebase based on the stats returned bygit::fetch()
, "git sync" will have to use lower-level API.Regarding
args.all_remotes
, copy-pastingif args.all_remotes { ... }
block wouldn't be so bad.