docs: fix or ignore missing docstrings #4
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This updates the docstrings, where trivial, to pass the flake8 docstring checks. In the cases where adding docstrings was non-trivial, the docstring check was ignored. Refs: betamaxpy#204 Signed-off-by: Jaremy Hatler <[email protected]>
jhatler
force-pushed
the
fix/docstringReview
branch
from
fa7d128
to
e9c2a2a
Compare
This was referenced Dec 23, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This updates the docstrings, where trivial, to pass the flake8 docstring checks. In the cases where adding docstrings was non-trivial, the docstring check was ignored.
Refs: betamaxpy#204
Signed-off-by: Jaremy Hatler [email protected]