Add constructors accepting the handler to wrap to all core handler wrappers

[lorban]

Add constructors that accept the wrapped handler to all core Handler.Wrapper subclasses

This allows the chaining of hander wrappers in a more elegant way; this is how we currently do it:

GzipHandler handler = new GzipHandler();
handler.setHandler(new EchoHandler());
server.setHandler(handler);

and this is what this change allows us to write:

server.setHandler(new GzipHandler(new EchoHandler()));

[sbordet]

Seems reasonable.
However, newly introduced parameterless constructors should be implemented by calling this(null), so that if the other constructor is changed, we properly delegate.
Also, I would like the Handler parameter to be the first, as it is canonical in Java (subclass has the same list of parameters as superclass, plus eventually others).

[janbartel]

I have a little bit of a doubt after the very long history of (at least some) handler constructors taking the parent handler as the argument, whereas this flips it around and passes the child. But I do think it looks neat. Maybe we solve that with very good documentation.

[lorban]

@janbartel this PR is a followup to #9948 that changed all handlers to only take the child handler as an argument as it was decided in #9946.

Said differently, passing the child handler to the constructor of a Handler.Wrapper is the new standard.

[janbartel]

@lorban hhhmm'ok. So you're saying that if I look in the documentation I'll find this difference with foregoing versions of jetty clearly spelt out? :)

[lorban]

@janbartel now you should :-)

[gregw]

I'm +1 on this once it actually compiles.