Issue #265 --list-config license enhancement #9964

strogiyotec · 2023-06-25T21:58:59Z

This is a start of a logic that finds the licenses of module jar files
So far it only checks the META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file
Later on, I will add pom.xml and License.txt file checks
@sbordet could you give me the feedback , I wonder if you agree with my solution
Here is the example output that I got during the testing

Jetty Server Classpath:
-----------------------
Version Information on 26 entries in the classpath.
Note: order presented here is how they would appear on the classpath.
      changes to the --module=name command line options will be reflected here.
 0:                  10.0.15 | ${jetty.base}/lib/ext/demo-mock-resources-10.0.15.jar |Eclipse Public License 2.0
 1:         10.0.16-SNAPSHOT | ${jetty.base}/lib/ext/demo-mock-resources-10.0.16-SNAPSHOT.jar |Eclipse Public License 2.0
 2:                    1.3.3 | ${jetty.base}/lib/ext/jakarta.transaction-api-1.3.3.jar |Eclipse Public License 2.0
 3:      1.4.1.v201005082020 | ${jetty.base}/lib/ext/javax.mail.glassfish-1.4.1.v201005082020.jar |(none specified)
 4:                    (dir) | ${jetty.base}/resources |(dir)
 5:                    2.0.5 | ${jetty.home}/lib/logging/slf4j-api-2.0.5.jar |(none specified)
 6:                    4.0.6 | ${jetty.home}/lib/jetty-servlet-api-4.0.6.jar |Apache License 2.0
 7:                    1.3.3 | ${jetty.home}/lib/jakarta.transaction-api-1.3.3.jar |Eclipse Public License 2.0
 8:                      9.5 | ${jetty.home}/lib/annotations/asm-9.5.jar |(none specified)
 9:                      9.5 | ${jetty.home}/lib/annotations/asm-analysis-9.5.jar |(none specified)
10:                      9.5 | ${jetty.home}/lib/annotations/asm-commons-9.5.jar |(none specified)
11:                      9.5 | ${jetty.home}/lib/annotations/asm-tree-9.5.jar |(none specified)
12:                    1.3.5 | ${jetty.home}/lib/annotations/jakarta.annotation-api-1.3.5.jar |Eclipse Public License 2.0
13:    3.26.0.v20210609-0549 | ${jetty.home}/lib/apache-jsp/org.eclipse.jdt.ecj-3.26.0.jar |(none specified)
14:                  10.0.15 | ${jetty.home}/lib/apache-jsp/org.eclipse.jetty.apache-jsp-10.0.15.jar |Eclipse Public License 2.0
15:                   9.0.52 | ${jetty.home}/lib/apache-jsp/org.mortbay.jasper.apache-el-9.0.52.jar |Apache License 2.0
16:                   9.0.52 | ${jetty.home}/lib/apache-jsp/org.mortbay.jasper.apache-jsp-9.0.52.jar |Apache License 2.0
17:                    1.2.5 | ${jetty.home}/lib/apache-jstl/org.apache.taglibs.taglibs-standard-impl-1.2.5.jar |Apache License 2.0
18:                    1.2.5 | ${jetty.home}/lib/apache-jstl/org.apache.taglibs.taglibs-standard-spec-1.2.5.jar |Apache License 2.0
19:                    1.1.2 | ${jetty.home}/lib/websocket/jetty-javax-websocket-api-1.1.2.jar |Apache License 2.0
20:                  10.0.15 | ${jetty.home}/lib/http2/http2-common-10.0.15.jar |Eclipse Public License 2.0
21:                  10.0.15 | ${jetty.home}/lib/http2/http2-hpack-10.0.15.jar |Eclipse Public License 2.0
22:                  10.0.15 | ${jetty.home}/lib/http2/http2-server-10.0.15.jar |Eclipse Public License 2.0
23:                1.70.00.0 | ${jetty.base}/lib/bouncycastle/bcpkix-jdk15on-1.70.jar |(none specified)
24:                   1.70.0 | ${jetty.base}/lib/bouncycastle/bcprov-jdk15on-1.70.jar |(none specified)
25:                1.70.00.0 | ${jetty.base}/lib/bouncycastle/bcutil-jdk15on-1.70.jar |(none specified)

All the licenses were taken from spdx

gregw · 2023-06-30T16:29:08Z

jetty-start/src/main/java/org/eclipse/jetty/start/AllOSSLicenses.java

+import java.util.AbstractMap;
+import java.util.Map;
+
+public class AllOSSLicenses


I have an issue with this file. Firstly it will need to be maintained, but more importantly it is from a generated list that says we need to see the sources to determine the licence for the list itself. I'm not sure we can check this in and say it is EPL/Apache2

I think we should just report the raw license info we find.... perhaps there is an option to lookup this info, but do so online without checking this is.

I don't like this file either.
Please remove it.

But the "license" we find in Bundle-License is a URL like https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0, so we can't really print the URL, hence this mapping file.

If we remove it, what do we report, the URLs?

A Bundle-License can be any text. (even non-urls)
Reporting the URLs does make sense, if we have report all of the discovered License information.

Keep in mind, that with JEP-238, it is possible to have multiple META-INF/MANIFEST.MF files too.
And they could even not agree with each other (we've seen this)

If we remove it, what do we report, the URLs?

The URLs are mostly humanly readable. It is clear what https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0 is.
But if there is need, an option can be provided to download the source json or XML and pretty print it from that. The data is in github, perhaps it is also in maven, in which case we can even cache it locally.

gregw · 2023-06-30T16:29:29Z

jetty-start/src/main/java/org/eclipse/jetty/start/JarLicense.java

+        String nonSpecified = "(none specified)";
+        try (JarFile jar = new JarFile(file))
+        {
+            return findFirstNonNullLicenseOr(


We need to report all licenses, not just the first.

joakime · 2023-06-30T18:28:48Z

jetty-start/src/main/java/org/eclipse/jetty/start/JarLicense.java

+                List.of(
+                    JarLicense::findFromManifest,
+                    JarLicense::findFromPOM,
+                    JarLicense::findFromLicenseFile


There should also be a JarLicense::findFromSPDXIndicator.
And it should report all of them, not just the first one it finds.

Now, you can present them in order though.

SPDX-License-Identifier results

POM

Manifest

License Files (NOTICE., LICENSE.) - the output of these should indicate (via URI) where they came from.
If there is any order, it should be present

github-actions · 2024-07-01T00:00:13Z

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has been a
full year without activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for your contributions.

joakime · 2024-07-15T13:21:21Z

Implemented in PR #11993 in branch jetty-12.0.x

Issue jetty#265 --list-config license enhancement

4a14f4a

strogiyotec mentioned this pull request Jun 25, 2023

--list-config license enhancement #265

Closed

Issue jetty#265 Add license headers to new files

f04a1ce

janbartel requested a review from joakime June 29, 2023 11:07

gregw requested changes Jun 30, 2023

View reviewed changes

joakime reviewed Jun 30, 2023

View reviewed changes

github-actions bot added the Stale For auto-closed stale issues and pull requests label Jul 1, 2024

gregw removed the Stale For auto-closed stale issues and pull requests label Jul 1, 2024

gregw self-assigned this Jul 1, 2024

joakime closed this Jul 15, 2024

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Issue #265 --list-config license enhancement #9964

Issue #265 --list-config license enhancement #9964

strogiyotec commented Jun 25, 2023 •

edited

Loading

gregw Jun 30, 2023

joakime Jun 30, 2023

sbordet Jun 30, 2023

joakime Jun 30, 2023

joakime Jun 30, 2023

gregw Jul 1, 2023

gregw Jun 30, 2023

joakime Jun 30, 2023

github-actions bot commented Jul 1, 2024

joakime commented Jul 15, 2024

Issue #265 --list-config license enhancement #9964

Issue #265 --list-config license enhancement #9964

Conversation

strogiyotec commented Jun 25, 2023 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

github-actions bot commented Jul 1, 2024

joakime commented Jul 15, 2024

strogiyotec commented Jun 25, 2023 •

edited

Loading