Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jetty 12.0.x osgi #9068

Merged
merged 34 commits into from
Dec 21, 2022
Merged

Jetty 12.0.x osgi #9068

merged 34 commits into from
Dec 21, 2022

Conversation

janbartel
Copy link
Contributor

Make osgi work with jetty-12 environments.

@janbartel janbartel requested a review from olamy December 19, 2022 05:17
@joakime
Copy link
Contributor

joakime commented Dec 20, 2022

Ay! it's green!

Can we merge this now?

@janbartel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh please God can we????!! Somebody review this.

@joakime
Copy link
Contributor

joakime commented Dec 20, 2022

@olamy please make this review a priority.

Copy link
Member

@olamy olamy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good (I have added some comments which can/should be fixed but maybe later?)

<spifly.version>1.3.4</spifly.version>
<!-- TODO -->
<skipTests>true</skipTests>
<spifly.version>1.3.6</spifly.version>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this version is repeated so many times maybe a single place would be better?

</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.osgi</groupId>
<artifactId>org.osgi.service.component</artifactId>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this and some other repeated would be better in dptMngt in top pom and added here without version (to have a single place with the version and dptMngt is a better way to handle transitivity and possible upper bound issues)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lets tackle this as a clean PR in a followup PR

@joakime joakime merged commit 1abaeb6 into jetty-12.0.x Dec 21, 2022
@joakime joakime deleted the jetty-12.0.x-osgi branch December 21, 2022 14:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants