Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HttpClientTransportDynamic does not initialize low-level clients #12348

Closed
sbordet opened this issue Oct 4, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #12349
Closed

HttpClientTransportDynamic does not initialize low-level clients #12348

sbordet opened this issue Oct 4, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #12349
Assignees
Labels
Bug For general bugs on Jetty side

Comments

@sbordet
Copy link
Contributor

sbordet commented Oct 4, 2024

Jetty version(s)
12

Description
Both HttpClientTransportOverHTTP[2|3] initialize the low-level client in their doStart(), but HttpClientTransportDynamic does not.

For example, calling HttpClient.setMaxResponseHeadersSize() is not forwarded to HTTP2Client when using HttpClientTransportDynamic.

@sbordet sbordet added the Bug For general bugs on Jetty side label Oct 4, 2024
@sbordet sbordet self-assigned this Oct 4, 2024
sbordet added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 4, 2024
…el clients.

Fixed initialization for HTTP/2 and HTTP/3.

Signed-off-by: Simone Bordet <[email protected]>
@sbordet sbordet moved this to 🏗 In progress in Jetty 12.0.15 FROZEN Oct 4, 2024
sbordet added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 10, 2024
…el clients. (#12349)

Fixed initialization for HTTP/2 and HTTP/3.
Fixed test that was relying on default configuration, rather than explicit.

Signed-off-by: Simone Bordet <[email protected]>
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 🏗 In progress to ✅ Done in Jetty 12.0.15 FROZEN Oct 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug For general bugs on Jetty side
Projects
No open projects
Status: ✅ Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant