Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(package): update dev dependencies #5175

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 25, 2017
Merged

Conversation

SimenB
Copy link
Member

@SimenB SimenB commented Dec 25, 2017

Summary
Just a periodic update 🙂

Test plan
Green CI

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
"test": "jest"
},
"dependencies": {
"react": "16.2.0",
"react": "16.0.0",
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

peer dep warning was annoying

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you downgrade to 16.0 but use a caret instead?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then we'll fail the peer dep again, won't we? Or does yarn check peer deps when resolving the tree?

Copy link
Member Author

@SimenB SimenB Dec 25, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If I add a caret, we're back to the peer dep warning.

React-native has no range on its peer: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/33a2e533b76d35c1b9fb32e926f7c2c27cb616e9/package.json#L144 (it's been updated to 16.2.0, but that's not released)

@SimenB
Copy link
Member Author

SimenB commented Dec 25, 2017

Need to downgrade eslint because of https://twitter.com/geteslint/status/944829414159810560

Upgrade of babel-eslint is blocked by facebook/fbjs#275

@cpojer
Copy link
Member

cpojer commented Dec 25, 2017

Seems like it’s failing node 8.

On another note, can we change CI to run flow, lint etc on Node 8 or 9 instead of 6? It should be much faster on newer versions to run the full suite.

@SimenB
Copy link
Member Author

SimenB commented Dec 25, 2017

We run lint on node 8 already, I snuck it in when we added node 9 CI :D

Node 8 is failing because of an incompatibility between latest eslint and babel-eslint. I'll take eslint back a minor

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #5175 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #5175   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   60.54%   60.54%           
=======================================
  Files         201      201           
  Lines        6707     6707           
  Branches        3        4    +1     
=======================================
  Hits         4061     4061           
  Misses       2645     2645           
  Partials        1        1

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2cb57a0...f308c0f. Read the comment docs.

@cpojer cpojer merged commit 4f685d8 into jestjs:master Dec 25, 2017
@cpojer
Copy link
Member

cpojer commented Dec 25, 2017

Smart ;)

@SimenB SimenB deleted the update-deps branch December 25, 2017 23:42
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Please note this issue tracker is not a help forum. We recommend using StackOverflow or our discord channel for questions.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 13, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants