feat: create prefer-comparison-matcher rule

README.md

@@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ installations requiring long-term consistency.
 | [no-test-prefixes](docs/rules/no-test-prefixes.md)                           | Use `.only` and `.skip` over `f` and `x`                            | ![recommended][] | ![fixable][] |
 | [no-test-return-statement](docs/rules/no-test-return-statement.md)           | Disallow explicitly returning from tests                            |                  |              |
 | [prefer-called-with](docs/rules/prefer-called-with.md)                       | Suggest using `toBeCalledWith()` or `toHaveBeenCalledWith()`        |                  |              |
+| [prefer-comparison-matcher](docs/rules/prefer-comparison-matcher.md)         | Suggest using the built-in comparison matchers                      |                  | ![fixable][] |
 | [prefer-expect-assertions](docs/rules/prefer-expect-assertions.md)           | Suggest using `expect.assertions()` OR `expect.hasAssertions()`     |                  | ![suggest][] |
 | [prefer-expect-resolves](docs/rules/prefer-expect-resolves.md)               | Prefer `await expect(...).resolves` over `expect(await ...)` syntax |                  | ![fixable][] |
 | [prefer-hooks-on-top](docs/rules/prefer-hooks-on-top.md)                     | Suggest having hooks before any test cases                          |                  |              |

docs/rules/prefer-comparison-matcher.md

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+# Suggest using the built-in comparison matchers (`prefer-comparison-matcher`)
+
+Jest has a number of built-in matchers for comparing numbers which allow for
+more readable tests and error messages if an expectation fails.
+
+## Rule details
+
+This rule checks for comparisons in tests that could be replaced with one of the
+following built-in comparison matchers:
+
+- `toBeGreaterThan`
+- `toBeGreaterThanOrEqual`
+- `toBeLessThan`
+- `toBeLessThanOrEqual`
+
+Examples of **incorrect** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+expect(x > 5).toBe(true);
+expect(x < 7).not.toEqual(true);
+expect(x <= y).toStrictEqual(true);
+```
+
+Examples of **correct** code for this rule:
+
+```js
+expect(x).toBeGreaterThan(5);
+expect(x).not.toBeLessThanOrEqual(7);
+expect(x).toBeLessThanOrEqual(y);
+
+// special case - see below
+expect(x < 'Carl').toBe(true);
+```
+
+Note that these matchers only work with numbers and bigints, and that the rule
+assumes that any variables on either side of the comparison operator are of one
+of those types - this means if you're using the comparison operator with
+strings, the fix applied by this rule will result in an error.
+
+```js
+expect(myName).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(theirName); // Matcher error: received value must be a number or bigint
+```
+
+The reason for this is that comparing strings with these operators is expected
+to be very rare and would mean not being able to have an automatic fixer for
+this rule.
+
+If for some reason you are using these operators to compare strings, you can
+disable this rule using an inline
+[configuration comment](https://eslint.org/docs/user-guide/configuring/rules#disabling-rules):
+
+```js
+// eslint-disable-next-line jest/prefer-comparison-matcher
+expect(myName > theirName).toBe(true);
+```

src/__tests__/__snapshots__/rules.test.ts.snap

@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ Object {
       "jest/no-test-prefixes": "error",
       "jest/no-test-return-statement": "error",
       "jest/prefer-called-with": "error",
+      "jest/prefer-comparison-matcher": "error",
       "jest/prefer-expect-assertions": "error",
       "jest/prefer-expect-resolves": "error",
       "jest/prefer-hooks-on-top": "error",

src/__tests__/rules.test.ts

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ import { existsSync } from 'fs';
 import { resolve } from 'path';
 import plugin from '../';
 
-const numberOfRules = 43;
+const numberOfRules = 44;
 const ruleNames = Object.keys(plugin.rules);
 const deprecatedRules = Object.entries(plugin.rules)
   .filter(([, rule]) => rule.meta.deprecated)

src/rules/__tests__/prefer-comparison-matcher.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
+import { TSESLint } from '@typescript-eslint/experimental-utils';
+import rule from '../prefer-comparison-matcher';
+import { espreeParser } from './test-utils';
+
+const ruleTester = new TSESLint.RuleTester({
+  parser: espreeParser,
+  parserOptions: {
+    ecmaVersion: 2015,
+  },
+});
+
+const generateInvalidCases = (
+  operator: string,
+  equalityMatcher: string,
+  preferredMatcher: string,
+  preferredMatcherWhenNegated: string,
+): Array<TSESLint.InvalidTestCase<'useToBeComparison', never>> => {
+  return [
+    {
+      code: `expect(value ${operator} 1).${equalityMatcher}(true);`,
+      output: `expect(value).${preferredMatcher}(1);`,
+      errors: [
+        {
+          messageId: 'useToBeComparison',
+          data: { preferredMatcher },
+          column: 18 + operator.length,
+          line: 1,
+        },
+      ],
+    },
+    {
+      code: `expect(value ${operator} 1)['${equalityMatcher}'](true);`,
+      output: `expect(value).${preferredMatcher}(1);`,
+      errors: [
+        {
+          messageId: 'useToBeComparison',
+          data: { preferredMatcher },
+          column: 18 + operator.length,
+          line: 1,
+        },
+      ],
+    },
+    {
+      code: `expect(value ${operator} 1).${equalityMatcher}(false);`,
+      output: `expect(value).${preferredMatcherWhenNegated}(1);`,
+      errors: [
+        {
+          messageId: 'useToBeComparison',
+          data: { preferredMatcher: preferredMatcherWhenNegated },
+          column: 18 + operator.length,
+          line: 1,
+        },
+      ],
+    },
+    {
+      code: `expect(value ${operator} 1)['${equalityMatcher}'](false);`,
+      output: `expect(value).${preferredMatcherWhenNegated}(1);`,
+      errors: [
+        {
+          messageId: 'useToBeComparison',
+          data: { preferredMatcher: preferredMatcherWhenNegated },
+          column: 18 + operator.length,
+          line: 1,
+        },
+      ],
+    },
+    {
+      code: `expect(value ${operator} 1).not.${equalityMatcher}(true);`,
+      output: `expect(value).${preferredMatcherWhenNegated}(1);`,
+      errors: [
+        {
+          messageId: 'useToBeComparison',
+          data: { preferredMatcher: preferredMatcherWhenNegated },
+          column: 18 + operator.length,
+          line: 1,
+        },
+      ],
+    },
+    {
+      code: `expect(value ${operator} 1)['not'].${equalityMatcher}(true);`,
+      output: `expect(value).${preferredMatcherWhenNegated}(1);`,
+      errors: [
+        {
+          messageId: 'useToBeComparison',
+          data: { preferredMatcher: preferredMatcherWhenNegated },
+          column: 18 + operator.length,
+          line: 1,
+        },
+      ],
+    },
+    {
+      code: `expect(value ${operator} 1).not.${equalityMatcher}(false);`,
+      output: `expect(value).${preferredMatcher}(1);`,
+      errors: [
+        {
+          messageId: 'useToBeComparison',
+          data: { preferredMatcher },
+          column: 18 + operator.length,
+          line: 1,
+        },
+      ],
+    },
+  ];
+};
+
+const generateValidStringLiteralCases = (operator: string, matcher: string) => {
+  return [
+    ['x', "'y'"],
+    ['x', '`y`'],
+    ['x', '`y${z}`'],
+  ].reduce((cases, [a, b]) => [
+    ...cases,
+    ...[
+      `expect(${a} ${operator} ${b}).${matcher}(true)`,
+      `expect(${a} ${operator} ${b}).${matcher}(false)`,
+      `expect(${a} ${operator} ${b}).not.${matcher}(true)`,
+      `expect(${a} ${operator} ${b}).not.${matcher}(false)`,
+      `expect(${b} ${operator} ${a}).${matcher}(true)`,
+      `expect(${b} ${operator} ${a}).${matcher}(false)`,
+      `expect(${b} ${operator} ${a}).not.${matcher}(true)`,
+      `expect(${b} ${operator} ${a}).not.${matcher}(false)`,
+      `expect(${a} ${operator} ${b}).${matcher}(true)`,
+      `expect(${a} ${operator} ${b}).${matcher}(false)`,
+      `expect(${a} ${operator} ${b}).not.${matcher}(true)`,
+      `expect(${a} ${operator} ${b}).not.${matcher}(false)`,
+      `expect(${b} ${operator} ${a}).${matcher}(true)`,
+      `expect(${b} ${operator} ${a}).${matcher}(false)`,
+      `expect(${b} ${operator} ${a}).not.${matcher}(true)`,
+      `expect(${b} ${operator} ${a}).not.${matcher}(false)`,
+      `expect(${b} ${operator} ${b}).not.${matcher}(false)`,
+    ],
+  ]);
+};
+
+const testComparisonOperator = (
+  operator: string,
+  preferredMatcher: string,
+  preferredMatcherWhenNegated: string,
+) => {
+  ruleTester.run(`prefer-to-be-comparison: ${operator}`, rule, {
+    valid: [
+      'expect()',
+      'expect({}).toStrictEqual({})',
+      `expect(value).${preferredMatcher}(1);`,
+      `expect(value).${preferredMatcherWhenNegated}(1);`,
+      `expect(value).not.${preferredMatcher}(1);`,
+      `expect(value).not.${preferredMatcherWhenNegated}(1);`,
+      `expect(value).${preferredMatcher}(1);`,
+      ...['toBe', 'toEqual', 'toStrictEqual'].reduce<string[]>(
+        (cases, equalityMatcher) => [
+          ...cases,
+          ...generateValidStringLiteralCases(operator, equalityMatcher),
+        ],
+        [],
+      ),
+    ],
+    invalid: ['toBe', 'toEqual', 'toStrictEqual'].reduce<
+      Array<TSESLint.InvalidTestCase<'useToBeComparison', never>>
+    >(
+      (cases, equalityMatcher) => [
+        ...cases,
+        ...generateInvalidCases(
+          operator,
+          equalityMatcher,
+          preferredMatcher,
+          preferredMatcherWhenNegated,
+        ),
+      ],
+      [],
+    ),
+  });
+};
+
+testComparisonOperator('>', 'toBeGreaterThan', 'toBeLessThanOrEqual');
+testComparisonOperator('<', 'toBeLessThan', 'toBeGreaterThanOrEqual');
+testComparisonOperator('>=', 'toBeGreaterThanOrEqual', 'toBeLessThan');
+testComparisonOperator('<=', 'toBeLessThanOrEqual', 'toBeGreaterThan');
+
+ruleTester.run(`prefer-to-be-comparison`, rule, {
+  valid: [
+    'expect()',
+    'expect({}).toStrictEqual({})',
+    'expect(a === b).toBe(true)',
+    'expect(a !== 2).toStrictEqual(true)',
+    'expect(a === b).not.toEqual(true)',
+    'expect(a !== "string").toStrictEqual(true)',
+    'expect(5 != a).toBe(true)',
+    'expect(a == "string").toBe(true)',
+    'expect(a == "string").not.toBe(true)',
+  ],
+  invalid: [],
+});