Skip to content

Conversation

@ZXShady
Copy link
Contributor

@ZXShady ZXShady commented Jul 30, 2025

Fixes #151 and #152

Also fixes the issue of ASSERT(1 = 5) compiling

@ZXShady ZXShady force-pushed the more_comparisons branch 7 times, most recently from 0f3377e to 170df2b Compare July 30, 2025 10:08
@ZXShady
Copy link
Contributor Author

ZXShady commented Jul 30, 2025

hmm it seems I have changed runtime behavior. although I would say that you shouldn't be putting side effects in your asserts but it still changed behavior

I think I will leave the bitfields out but keep the null thingy

@ZXShady ZXShady force-pushed the more_comparisons branch 14 times, most recently from aa89ed3 to 12b3982 Compare August 2, 2025 02:25
@ZXShady ZXShady force-pushed the more_comparisons branch 4 times, most recently from d68e514 to d2497d9 Compare October 18, 2025 14:54
Allow NULL macro comparison
@ZXShady
Copy link
Contributor Author

ZXShady commented Oct 18, 2025

@jeremy-rifkin I decided to remove the bit field checking since it is a little bit buggy and requires C++20, i kept the null constant checking, and fixed invalid code from compiling

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

error: comparison between pointer and integer

1 participant