docs(rfc): flip RFC 0043 to green — all seven criteria pass - #670
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Qtny6z6cA74xPZa4qRhk4F Signed-off-by: Jens Holdgaard Pedersen <Jens@holdgaard.org>
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 52 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughRFC 0043 now marks its implementation status as ChangesRFC 0043 status update
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR updates RFC 0043’s status and banner to reflect that all §5 acceptance criteria now pass, moving the RFC from specified to green (docs-only, no code changes).
Changes:
- Flip RFC 0043 frontmatter
statustogreen. - Update the RFC status banner to summarize which PRs/tests satisfied each criterion and note that
acceptedremains a maintainer flip.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/rfcs/0043-event-name-attribute-ingest.md`:
- Around line 14-25: Update the RFC status line to use the actual
review/completion date of July 28, 2026, or defer the status transition until
July 29; keep the existing status and criteria details unchanged.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: b803ddcb-1d0f-41fe-b71a-b2c979040f29
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/rfcs/0043-event-name-attribute-ingest.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Qtny6z6cA74xPZa4qRhk4F Signed-off-by: Jens Holdgaard Pedersen <Jens@holdgaard.org>
Summary
RFC 0043 (event_name from the legacy event.name attribute) goes
specified→green: #668 landed the derivation with RFC0043.1–.4/.7 at the materialisation boundary (both encodings through the one seam), #669 closed .5 (the end-to-endevent_name ==query over attr-only records through the real miner and store) and .6 (keying engagement via the id-separation observable, criterion refined inline in #669). Frontmatter and banner flipped together. No thesis-gate applies;acceptedis a maintainer flip.mdbook buildclean; docs-only.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01Qtny6z6cA74xPZa4qRhk4F
Summary by CodeRabbit