Skip to content

CpsFlowExecution: parseScript(): log "Method Too Large" situations more readably #817

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 45 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jimklimov
Copy link

@jimklimov jimklimov commented Nov 23, 2023

A small almost-cosmetic change which makes life easier for my colleagues when they develop (and debug failures of) Jenkins scripted pipelines.

UPDATE: Grew to be not so small, so evicted into a method of its own to constrain changes to other parts of the codebase. Learned a few more tricks over time, as new MTL situations were found in the field.

@jimklimov jimklimov requested a review from a team as a code owner November 23, 2023 08:35
@bitwiseman
Copy link
Contributor

Out of curiosity, what output does this give you and how is it helpful?

jimklimov and others added 5 commits December 11, 2023 21:55
…to avoid catching by full name

Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <[email protected]>
…argeExceptionRealistic() tests

Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <[email protected]>
…sException as a carrier of MethodTooLargeException; re-throw with just a compact message to appear in the build log

Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <[email protected]>
@jimklimov
Copy link
Author

jimklimov commented Mar 5, 2024

Tests helped me realize that the catch block was a bit naive; the groovy parser returns a special exception class with a collection of errors, one of which (okay, the only one) is the Method Too Large one.

PR updated with handling of both eventualities, and if the only exception in view is the MTL - re-throw with a short message avoiding a wall of text in pipeline log. From self-test console (showing both server log id=... and pipeline log test0), it now complains much more readably, like this:

   6.903 [test0 #1] Started
   7.635 [id=99]	SEVERE	o.j.p.w.cps.CpsFlowExecution#parseScript: FAILED to parse WorkflowScript (the pipeline script) due to MethodTooLargeException: Method too large: WorkflowScript.___cps___1 ()Lcom/cloudbees/groovy/cps/impl/CpsFunction;
   7.680 [test0 #1] java.lang.RuntimeException: FAILED to parse WorkflowScript (the pipeline script) due to MethodTooLargeException: Method too large: WorkflowScript.___cps___1 ()Lcom/cloudbees/groovy/cps/impl/CpsFunction;
   7.680 [test0 #1] 	at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsFlowExecution.parseScript(CpsFlowExecution.java:697)
   7.680 [test0 #1] 	at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsFlowExecution.start(CpsFlowExecution.java:586)
   7.681 [test0 #1] 	at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.job.WorkflowRun.run(WorkflowRun.java:335)
   7.681 [test0 #1] 	at hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:101)
   7.681 [test0 #1] 	at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:442)
   7.700 [test0 #1] Finished: FAILURE
   7.718 [id=27]	INFO	hudson.lifecycle.Lifecycle#onStatusUpdate: Stopping Jenkins
   7.766 [id=27]	INFO	hudson.lifecycle.Lifecycle#onStatusUpdate: Jenkins stopped

Still got a bit of stack trace from generic handling, but it is reasonably short - the ultimate pipeline devs won't have to scroll up a couple of screenfuls just to learn that their script was too long or complex.

Now that the message is visible to end users, I am open to suggestions how to make it more actionable, and/or if the RuntimeException is the right re-throw wrapper, and of course which color should the bike shed be (or this can all be part of another PR) :D

e.g. to explain about script length or its coding complexity and what to do about it (nesting, amount of stages, separation of methods into JSL classes, etc.); maybe point to a knowledge-base URL for a better maintainable article on the subject (don't want to replace one wall of text in the logs with another, right?)

@jglick jglick requested a review from a team March 5, 2024 12:22
…unt to satisfy different CI platforms

Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <[email protected]>
…uggestions for pipeline devs

Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <[email protected]>
@jimklimov
Copy link
Author

jimklimov commented Mar 5, 2024

Out of curiosity, what output does this give you and how is it helpful?

Until today, it was helpful to myself and a few colleagues who may/can/do follow traces of the Jenkins server logs when developing pipelines (testing in private Jenkins instances and those wrapped by IDEs notwithstanding).

After the review comments some months ago (thanks, and sorry for not noticing) and a coding effort today, this should be better visible and more "actionable" to a more general population - now shown as a smaller wall of text right in the pipeline build logs:

   5.380 [test0 #1] Started
   5.975 [test0 #1] java.lang.RuntimeException: FAILED to parse WorkflowScript
       (the pipeline script) due to MethodTooLargeException; please refactor to
       simplify code structure and/or move logic to a Jenkins Shared Library:
       Method too large: WorkflowScript.___cps___1 ()Lcom/cloudbees/groovy/cps/impl/CpsFunction;
   5.975 [test0 #1] 	at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsFlowExecution.parseScript(CpsFlowExecution.java:703)
   5.975 [test0 #1] 	at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsFlowExecution.start(CpsFlowExecution.java:584)
   5.975 [test0 #1] 	at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.job.WorkflowRun.run(WorkflowRun.java:335)
   5.975 [test0 #1] 	at hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:101)
   5.975 [test0 #1] 	at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:442)
   6.011 [test0 #1] Finished: FAILURE

...which is IMHO a bit more comprehensible than the original (especially the first time you see it):

...
 > git checkout -f c391f78bf7ac0d4afffab4f312a3d81cc41577d1 # timeout=10
Commit message: "..."
 > git rev-list --no-walk c391f78bf7ac0d4afffab4f312a3d81cc41577d1 # timeout=10
org.codehaus.groovy.control.MultipleCompilationErrorsException: startup failed:
General error during class generation: Method too large: WorkflowScript.___cps___20692 ()Lcom/cloudbees/groovy/cps/impl/CpsFunction;

groovyjarjarasm.asm.MethodTooLargeException: Method too large: WorkflowScript.___cps___20692 ()Lcom/cloudbees/groovy/cps/impl/CpsFunction;
        at groovyjarjarasm.asm.MethodWriter.computeMethodInfoSize(MethodWriter.java:2087)
        at groovyjarjarasm.asm.ClassWriter.toByteArray(ClassWriter.java:447)
        at org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilationUnit$17.call(CompilationUnit.java:850)
        at org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilationUnit.applyToPrimaryClassNodes(CompilationUnit.java:1087)
        at org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilationUnit.doPhaseOperation(CompilationUnit.java:624)
        at org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilationUnit.processPhaseOperations(CompilationUnit.java:602)
        at org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilationUnit.compile(CompilationUnit.java:579)
        at groovy.lang.GroovyClassLoader.doParseClass(GroovyClassLoader.java:323)
        at groovy.lang.GroovyClassLoader.parseClass(GroovyClassLoader.java:293)
        at groovy.lang.GroovyShell.parseClass(GroovyShell.java:677)
        at groovy.lang.GroovyShell.parse(GroovyShell.java:689)
        at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsGroovyShell.doParse(CpsGroovyShell.java:142)
        at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsGroovyShell.reparse(CpsGroovyShell.java:127)
        at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsFlowExecution.parseScript(CpsFlowExecution.java:554)
        at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsFlowExecution.start(CpsFlowExecution.java:506)
        at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.job.WorkflowRun.run(WorkflowRun.java:335)
        at hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:101)
        at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:442)

1 error

        at org.codehaus.groovy.control.ErrorCollector.failIfErrors(ErrorCollector.java:309)
        at org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilationUnit.applyToPrimaryClassNodes(CompilationUnit.java:1107)
        at org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilationUnit.doPhaseOperation(CompilationUnit.java:624)
        at org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilationUnit.processPhaseOperations(CompilationUnit.java:602)
        at org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilationUnit.compile(CompilationUnit.java:579)
        at groovy.lang.GroovyClassLoader.doParseClass(GroovyClassLoader.java:323)
        at groovy.lang.GroovyClassLoader.parseClass(GroovyClassLoader.java:293)
        at groovy.lang.GroovyShell.parseClass(GroovyShell.java:677)
        at groovy.lang.GroovyShell.parse(GroovyShell.java:689)
        at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsGroovyShell.doParse(CpsGroovyShell.java:142)
        at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsGroovyShell.reparse(CpsGroovyShell.java:127)
        at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsFlowExecution.parseScript(CpsFlowExecution.java:554)
        at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsFlowExecution.start(CpsFlowExecution.java:506)
        at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.job.WorkflowRun.run(WorkflowRun.java:335)
        at hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:101)
        at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:442)
Finished: FAILURE

...and requires less scrolling to get to the crux of the issue =D

jimklimov and others added 2 commits March 5, 2024 15:52
…ethods (class complexity) from maxTryCatch (nesting depth)

Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@jglick jglick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The logic here is pretty convoluted and seems excessive when we do not really need to make things particularly pretty, we just need to offer some clue beyond what there is today. Would suffice to do something along the lines of

if (Functions.printThrowable(x).containsString("MethodTooLargeException")) {
    throw new IllegalArgumentException("…your hint here…", x);
} else {
    throw x;
}

jimklimov and others added 2 commits June 11, 2024 08:57
…wExecution.java


Do not log to server console log (not all server admins are those who run the projects with issues).

Co-authored-by: Jesse Glick <[email protected]>
Comment on lines 690 to 701
if (ecCount > 1) {
// Not squashing with explicit MethodTooLargeException
// re-thrown below, in this codepath we have other errors.
throw new RuntimeException(msg, x);
} else {
// Do not confuse pipeline devs by a wall of text in the
// build console, but let the full context be found in
// server log with some dedication.
LOGGER.log(Level.FINE, mtlEx.getMessage());
//throw new RuntimeException(msg, mtlEx);
throw new RuntimeException(msg);
}
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Regarding the concern of "pretty convoluted logic" - this block is largely why I did it so: groovy can return a MultipleCompilationErrorsException with an attached collection of one or more errors (broadly speaking), so we need to count if we only had the MethodTooLargeException one way or another here (and then print the pretty log), or also something else and then better print everything for human devs to sift through it diligently.

@jimklimov
Copy link
Author

Sorry it took a while to notice that there was finally a new review here - too many browser tabs open to keep track of such :D

Thanks for doing it!

@jimklimov
Copy link
Author

jimklimov commented Jun 17, 2024

Hm, got another use-case to handle: managed to get a step definition too large (aka "global variable", anyhow in JSL as vars/cloudBranch.groovy)!

So the pipeline chugged along until it called that step - and that's where the job crashed, with a different exception:

[Pipeline] End of Pipeline
Also:   org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.actions.ErrorAction$ErrorId: a1490d3b-63d7-4555-ae55-3a0d6856aee6
org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsCompilationErrorsException: startup failed:
General error during class generation: Method too large: cloudBranch.___cps___586328 ()Lcom/cloudbees/groovy/cps/impl/CpsFunction;

groovyjarjarasm.asm.MethodTooLargeException: Method too large: cloudBranch.___cps___586328 ()Lcom/cloudbees/groovy/cps/impl/CpsFunction;
	at groovyjarjarasm.asm.MethodWriter.computeMethodInfoSize(MethodWriter.java:2087)
	at groovyjarjarasm.asm.ClassWriter.toByteArray(ClassWriter.java:447)
	at org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilationUnit$17.call(CompilationUnit.java:850)
	at org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilationUnit.applyToPrimaryClassNodes(CompilationUnit.java:1087)
...
<no further pointers to the class in question>
...
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:642)
	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)

1 error

	at org.codehaus.groovy.control.ErrorCollector.failIfErrors(ErrorCollector.java:309)
	at org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilationUnit.applyToPrimaryClassNodes(CompilationUnit.java:1107)
	at org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilationUnit.doPhaseOperation(CompilationUnit.java:624)
	at org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilationUnit.processPhaseOperations(CompilationUnit.java:602)
	at org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilationUnit.compile(CompilationUnit.java:579)
	at groovy.lang.GroovyClassLoader.doParseClass(GroovyClassLoader.java:323)
...
	at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.LoggingInvoker.getProperty(LoggingInvoker.java:121)
	at com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.impl.PropertyAccessBlock.rawGet(PropertyAccessBlock.java:20)
	at WorkflowScript.run(WorkflowScript:428)
	at com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.CpsDefaultGroovyMethods.each(CpsDefaultGroovyMethods:2125)
	at com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.CpsDefaultGroovyMethods.each(CpsDefaultGroovyMethods:2110)
	at com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.CpsDefaultGroovyMethods.each(CpsDefaultGroovyMethods:2163)
	at WorkflowScript.run(WorkflowScript:385)
	at ___cps.transform___(Native Method)
	at com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.impl.PropertyishBlock$ContinuationImpl.get(PropertyishBlock.java:73)
	at com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.LValueBlock$GetAdapter.receive(LValueBlock.java:30)
	at com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.impl.PropertyishBlock$ContinuationImpl.fixName(PropertyishBlock.java:65)
...
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:572)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:317)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1144)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:642)
	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)
Finished: FAILURE

Note there are actually two lines at WorkflowScript.run(WorkflowScript:NNN), pipeline code at line 385 starts an ...each {} closure to iterate several repos this job processes, and the line 428 actually calls the cloudBranch() method.

Gotta look into the structure of CpsCompilationErrorsException to see how to best parse it here (and know if "method too large" was the only error, so the report can be trimmed), and also consider that not only WorkflowScript can have such troubles.

jimklimov and others added 2 commits June 24, 2024 18:00
Notably, the latter is a Throwable but not an Exception so e.g. LinkageError might be not handled.

Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <[email protected]>
jimklimov added 14 commits June 28, 2024 10:43
…clude x.getMessage(), a copy is already there

Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <[email protected]>
…ationErrorsException.getMessage() is too long with all the original stack trace

Introduce an xMsgStart with curated start of original Throwable's
message (until the first "\tat somewhere(file:line)" match).

Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <[email protected]>
…ee in pretty-printed overflowedClassName

Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <[email protected]>
…SNAME_PATTERN and CLASSNAME_MENTIONS_PATTERN expectations/assumptions in code

Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <[email protected]>
…e may have slashes for class or not for step

Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <[email protected]>
…ine scripts named like "Script<NUM>"

Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <[email protected]>
…excerpts into snip-markers to separate visibly

Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <[email protected]>
…dClassNameBreadcrumbs as a StringBuilder

Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <[email protected]>
…verflowedClassName for overflowedClassNameBreadcrumbs

Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <[email protected]>
…excerpts - only add a newline before final wrapper if not present in wrapped text

Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <[email protected]>
…eraction" with ContinuationGroup.fixupStackTrace()

Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <[email protected]>
…x in the end, use a dedicated "RuntimeException rtex" object

Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <[email protected]>
@jimklimov
Copy link
Author

jimklimov commented Jun 28, 2024

Updated screenshots, now with some detail learned about MTL issues happening in the JSL also:

  • Pipeline script too large:
...
Executing git in workdir C:\Users\klimov\.jenkins\workspace\test-MethodTooLarge@libs\3fbaa4c2a74a618783608223aa05bcd2484d251d9f183ec393764a9458686f38
java.lang.RuntimeException: FAILED to parse WorkflowScript (the pipeline script) due to MethodTooLargeException; please refactor to simplify code structure and/or move logic to a Jenkins Shared Library:
-----
org.codehaus.groovy.control.MultipleCompilationErrorsException: startup failed:
General error during class generation: Method too large: WorkflowScript.___cps___5112 ()Lcom/cloudbees/groovy/cps/impl/CpsFunction;
groovyjarjarasm.asm.MethodTooLargeException: Method too large: WorkflowScript.___cps___5112 ()Lcom/cloudbees/groovy/cps/impl/CpsFunction;
-----

Complete details can be seen in server log at FINE/FINER level (Jenkins admin access for org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsFlowExecution.MethodTooLargeLogging is required)
Finished: FAILURE
  • JSL step:
...
[Pipeline] End of Pipeline
Also:   org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.actions.ErrorAction$ErrorId: e5f57f7d-1081-49cf-a579-0644086eead0
java.lang.RuntimeException: FAILED to parse presumed JSL step 'cloudBranch' due to MethodTooLargeException; please refactor to simplify code structure:
-----
org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsCompilationErrorsException: startup failed:
General error during class generation: Method too large: cloudBranch.___cps___1028 ()Lcom/cloudbees/groovy/cps/impl/CpsFunction;
groovyjarjarasm.asm.MethodTooLargeException: Method too large: cloudBranch.___cps___1028 ()Lcom/cloudbees/groovy/cps/impl/CpsFunction;
-----

Complete details can be seen in server log at FINE/FINER level (Jenkins admin access for org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsFlowExecution.MethodTooLargeLogging is required)
Finished: FAILURE
  • JSL class:
...
[Pipeline] End of Pipeline
Also:   org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.actions.ErrorAction$ErrorId: 9338d5ab-bd20-4f09-b81a-2d13b2eaf911
java.lang.RuntimeException: FAILED to parse presumed JSL class 'com/myprovys/ci/BranchResync' due to MethodTooLargeException; please refactor to simplify code structure:
-----
org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsCompilationErrorsException: startup failed:
General error during class generation: Method too large: com/myprovys/ci/BranchResync.___cps___2123 ()Lcom/cloudbees/groovy/cps/impl/CpsFunction;
groovyjarjarasm.asm.MethodTooLargeException: Method too large: com/myprovys/ci/BranchResync.___cps___2123 ()Lcom/cloudbees/groovy/cps/impl/CpsFunction;
-----

Complete details can be seen in server log at FINE/FINER level (Jenkins admin access for org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsFlowExecution.MethodTooLargeLogging is required)
Finished: FAILURE

Notably, code was made to trace the messages I've seen (and posted earlier above) with "bread-crumbs" to see the code path through the pipeline script and groovy (JSL) files and line numbers (for steps/classes with code too large), only to discover this is slapped on later via ContinuationGroup.fixupStackTrace() called from PropertyishBlock.ContinuationImpl.get() :\

Probably some refactoring can be due to take advantage of that bit. At least, the groovy-cps code is now in the same plugin.

@jglick jglick requested a review from a team July 5, 2024 22:40
}
actionableMsg.append("; please refactor to simplify code structure");
if (overflowedClassNameReport.contains("WorkflowScript") || CLASSNAME_SCRIPTNUM_PATTERN.matcher(overflowedClassName).find())
actionableMsg.append(" and/or move logic to a Jenkins Shared Library");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

BTW the terminology in https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/pipeline/shared-libraries/ is unfortunate. By definition a “library” is “shared”; why else would you create a library? The plugin itself uses the term Pipeline Groovy library.

@@ -466,6 +470,8 @@ Timing time(TimingKind kind) {

static final Logger TIMING_LOGGER = Logger.getLogger(CpsFlowExecution.class.getName() + ".timing");

static final Logger METHOD_TOO_LARGE_LOGGER = Logger.getLogger(CpsFlowExecution.class.getName() + ".MethodTooLargeLogging");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there some reason not to simply use

private static final Logger LOGGER = Logger.getLogger(CpsFlowExecution.class.getName());
?

//rtex.addSuppressed(mtlEx);

return rtex;
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am just going to note the irony of a 285-line method here. 😁

Throwable mtlEx = null;
int ecCount = 0;
String xStr = Functions.printThrowable(x); // includes x.getMessage() contents
final Pattern LINE_SEP_PATTERN = Pattern.compile("\\R");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had to look this one up.

Any Unicode linebreak sequence, is equivalent to \u000D\u000A|[\u000A\u000B\u000C\u000D\u0085\u2028\u2029]

AFAICT

Suggested change
final Pattern LINE_SEP_PATTERN = Pattern.compile("\\R");
final Pattern LINE_SEP_PATTERN = Pattern.compile("\r?\n");

suffices.

.append(METHOD_TOO_LARGE_LOGGER.getName())
.append(" is required)");

//return new RuntimeException(actionableMsg.toString(), mtlEx);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do not leave commented-out code in a final PR (unless there is a real possibility it should be resurrected some day soonish and a preceding comment explains those circumstances).

} else if (x instanceof CpsCompilationErrorsException) {
// Defined in this plugin, to clone a message and stack trace
// from a MultipleCompilationErrorsException and be serializable.
// Grep it as text for "MethodTooLargeException" and "1 error"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it not make more sense to just enrich CpsCompilationErrorsException with whatever information you need? AFAICT all you are looking for ultimately is the MethodTooLargeException.message. So, we could just keep that in a field?

Comment on lines +95 to +96
@Test public void methodTooLargeExceptionFabricated() throws Exception {
// Fabricate a MethodTooLargeException which "normally" happens when evaluated
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a reason to keep this test case, given the “realistic” test below?

Comment on lines +123 to +124
// * java.lang.StackOverflowError varies per JDK platform
// (CI on Linux was unhappy with 255, on Windows with 1023)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can set a per-thread stack size, but unfortunately the unit of measurement is unspecified and presumably specific to JVM implementation details, so this is probably not that helpful.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(Why would you would be getting a JVM-level SOE, anyway? This is all dealing with the CPS VM that does not use the native stack.)

Copy link
Member

@jglick jglick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK I think, though I can barely follow most of the code here. @dwnusbaum did you expect to review?

@dwnusbaum
Copy link
Member

dwnusbaum commented Mar 27, 2025

I have no plans to review this. My impression from a very brief look at the code was that it seemed quite complicated, but I am not blocking it. IMO creating a page like https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/pipeline/cps-method-mismatches/ explaining the situation and recommendations in detail seems like it could help, and then perhaps this code could be simplified to only check the stack trace for the relevant class types and add a suppressed exception that links to that page, accepting potential false positives and not adding the additional context currently added by this PR (but maybe that context is critically useful, IDK).

@jglick
Copy link
Member

jglick commented Mar 27, 2025

only check the stack trace for the relevant class types and add a suppressed exception

#817 (review) more or less. IIUC this PR offers the same actionable information as was already there, but formatted differently?

links to that page

Actually a redirect URL like in jenkins-infra/jenkins.io#2290.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants