[Marukome0743]

Summary

• correct the cacheable _.source example to use the supported path field
• keep the example aligned with the current environment directive schema

Problem

The cache behavior documentation used file inside _.source, but the source directive accepts path. Copying the documented example therefore fails configuration deserialization instead of sourcing dynamic.sh.

Verification

• mise exec -- prettier --check docs/cache-behavior.md — passed
• mise run docs:build — blocked by an unrelated existing Vue compiler failure in docs/cli/tool-alias/set.md: decode.fromCodePoint is not a function
• mise run lint — blocked locally because hk could not detect the Git repository in this Sapling checkout

Addresses #8735

AI-assisted — Tool: Codex; model: openai/unavailable; version: unavailable.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the _.source directive example to use the path attribute.
  • Clarified that cacheable = false remains supported.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4fe225c4-18ab-4f96-bcde-fb3ca576ae6c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6f52dcd and d981a99.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/cache-behavior.md

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 7 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The cache behavior documentation updates the _.source example to use path instead of file. The example retains cacheable = false.

Changes

Cache behavior documentation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update source path example docs/cache-behavior.md	The _.source example now uses the path attribute and retains cacheable = false.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to d981a

This localized documentation fix corrects the cacheable source example without changing runtime behavior; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks and review.

Suggested reviewers: jdx

Poem

A rabbit hops through cached code,
And finds the right path on the road.
file rests beneath the tree,
While false keeps caching quiet and free.
Documentation blooms with glee.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the documentation change to the cacheable source example.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[greptile-apps]

Greptile Summary

Corrects the cache behavior documentation so the _.source example uses the current path field.

• Replaces the unsupported file key with path in docs/cache-behavior.md.

Confidence Score: 5/5

The PR appears safe to merge.

No blocking failure remains.

Important Files Changed

Filename	Overview
docs/cache-behavior.md	Updates the source-directive example to use the schema-supported path field.

_{Reviews (2): Last reviewed commit: "docs(env): fix cacheable source example" | Re-trigger Greptile}

[github-actions]

This PR currently has failing checks. If this continues for 7 days, it will be closed automatically.

This is warning day 1 of 7.

Please update the PR when you have a chance. Feel free to reopen or create a new PR if it is closed and you'd like to continue working on it.

This comment was generated by an automated workflow.