Mark LogEntryAdminMixin methods output as safe where required

[AceFire6]

As per my comment (#159 (comment)). I believe using format_html to be a better solution to that proposed in #159.

• Remove allow_tags as they've been deprecated as of Django 2.0
• Use format_html to provide conditional escaping and mark_safe functionality

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #167 into master will decrease coverage by 0.09%.
The diff coverage is 60%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master     #167     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage   83.36%   83.26%   -0.1%     
=========================================
  Files          19       19             
  Lines         511      508      -3     
=========================================
- Hits          426      423      -3     
  Misses         85       85

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/auditlog/mixins.py	80% <60%> (-0.96%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update fced0a6...381d7b5. Read the comment docs.

[audiolion]

Looks good, thanks for the PR

[robguttman]

@jjkester is this ready for a new 0.4.6 release?

[jjkester]

@robguttman Releases are a bit ad-hoc currently, I might investigate whether it is feasible to release automatically by creating a Travis job for that to take the manual interaction out of the equation.

As for now, I'm all for a new release, but I'm traveling for work at the moment, I'll see what I can do, but don't expect a release in a couple of days. Thanks for your patience.

[robguttman]

@jjkester, understood - we appreciate your efforts on this great lib!

[robguttman]

@jjkester, when do you think you can do a 0.4.6 release?

[jjkester]

@robguttman Thanks for the heads-up. I created a PR (#183) to automatically deploy to Travis. I could not merge it right away due to failing tests. These need to be addressed, and I kind of hoped after a try myself that someone else would pick it up since my time is very limited right now.

Since I'm (still) traveling (again), I don't have the credentials to manually release a version available right now. If you want to look at the failing tests, feel free, so we can get #183 merged and the releases going. Otherwise you would have to wait since I won't be able to release manually for a couple of weeks.

[robguttman]

@jjkester, the Travis tests look like they all passed. What seems to have "failed" are the code coverage targets - but perhaps I'm reading the results wrong? When I try to look at the codecov report I just see this message:

Missing base report.
Unable to compare commits because the base of the compare did not upload a coverage report.

What next to release 0.4.6?

[texnic]

What is the current status? Any changes since last autumn?