Catch creates its own shared scope.

[taku0]

"catch e" should create its own shared scope with e in it.
Current implementation simply add e to current scope.
However, in compiled JavaScript, e is local to catch clause.
This mismatch breaks lexical scope of CoffeeScript.

Neither simply adding e to current scope, nor creating non-shared scope passes the following test:

test "catch statements should create shared scope with their argument", ->
  g = ->
    try
    catch e
    e = 2 # e should local to g
    try
      throw "error"
    catch e
      e = 3 # e should local to catch clause
      x = 1 # x should local to g, not catch clause

    ok e is 2
    ok x is 1

  e = 1 # this e should be different to e in g
  g()
  ok e is 1

[satyr]

This might backfire due to JScript (which we must support) bug:

> cat 1476.js
e = 0
try { throw 1 } catch (e) { e = 2 }
WSH.echo(e)

> cscript 1476.js
2

@zimothy's fix is about as good as we can get.

[taku0]

I see @zimothy's fix matches JScript's behavior.
Using 'var' with scope.add instead of 'param' may be better, but there is no perfect solution since JScript's bug contradicts ECMAScript specification.

My patch doesn't do well with JScript after all. I close the request. Thanks.