greenkeeper: remove website from greenkeeper config #815
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- website doesn't need vulnerability updates because it has no forms or
real attack surface and it is not a published library that others
depend on
- greenkeeper wasn't just for vulnerability updates though; automatic
dep updates aren't necessary either as no one depends on it and it's
not frequently used (until recently was last updated ~6 months ago)
- greenkeeper is no longer a thing, but not sure if Snyk is perhaps
using the same config, so try changing it to reduce all these
unnecessary, duplicative, and buggy Snyk PRs
- based on the website / docs, it doesn't sound like this will change
anything and this file should probably be deleted, but since I don't
have access to Snyk to be able to change settings, this is all I
can try
|
This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more). 🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/formium/tsdx/ba1u7o6on |
paul-vd
pushed a commit
to EezyQuote/tsdx
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2020
- website doesn't need vulnerability updates because it has no forms or
real attack surface and it is not a published library that others
depend on
- greenkeeper wasn't just for vulnerability updates though; automatic
dep updates aren't necessary either as no one depends on it and it's
not frequently used (until recently was last updated ~6 months ago)
- greenkeeper is no longer a thing, but not sure if Snyk is perhaps
using the same config, so try changing it to reduce all these
unnecessary, duplicative, and buggy Snyk PRs
- based on the website / docs, it doesn't sound like this will change
anything and this file should probably be deleted, but since I don't
have access to Snyk to be able to change settings, this is all I
can try
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
website doesn't need vulnerability updates because it has no forms or
real attack surface and it is not a published library that others
depend on
dep updates aren't necessary either as no one depends on it and it's
not frequently used (until recently was last updated ~6 months ago)
greenkeeper is no longer a thing, but not sure if Snyk is perhaps
using the same config, so try changing it to reduce all these
unnecessary, duplicative, and buggy Snyk PRs
anything and this file should probably be deleted, but since I don't
have access to Snyk to be able to change settings, this is all I
can try
Tags
c.f. #807 .. and #806 and #804 and #809 and #812 and #813 and probably more...