Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make http.Response.Status respect RFC 2616, like in Go stdlib. #159

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

constantoine
Copy link
Contributor

@constantoine constantoine commented Nov 14, 2024

Although RFC 2616 has been superseded with RFC 9110, some client implementation still rely on certain behavious regarding the Status-Line.

Now, as httpmock currently implements it, per RFC 9110#6.2-1, the "reason phrase" is actually optional, and you need only to include the status code.

Back in the days of RFC 2616#6.1, the Status-Line had to contain both the status code (eg. 200) and its textual representation (eg. OK).

Change code is directly stolen from the Go standard library.

This aims to fix #83 .

@constantoine constantoine changed the title Make http.Response.Status respect with RFC 2616, like in Go stdlib. Make http.Response.Status respect RFC 2616, like in Go stdlib. Nov 14, 2024
response.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@maxatome
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @constantoine, could you squash your commits please?

Although RFC 2616 has been superseded with RFC 9110, some client implementation still rely on certain behavious regarding the Status-Line.

Now, as httpmock currently implements it, per [RFC 9110#6.2-1](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#section-6.2-1), the "reason phrase" is actually optional, and you need only to include the status code.

Back in the days of [RFC 2616](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2616.html#section-6.1), per jarcoal#6.1, the Status-Line had to contain both the status code (eg. 200) and its textual representation (eg. OK).

Change code is directly stolen from the Go standard library.

Signed-off-by: Cléo Rebert <[email protected]>
@constantoine
Copy link
Contributor Author

@maxatome I think we should be good :)

@maxatome maxatome merged commit 1ebd59a into jarcoal:v1 Nov 14, 2024
13 checks passed
@maxatome
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @constantoine! I hope to publish a new release soon, I work on a new feature not fully ready yet.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use http status number with text code instead of just the status number as a string
2 participants