Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 1, 2022. It is now read-only.

Adjust thrift shadow configuration and version #458

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 19, 2018

Conversation

jpkrohling
Copy link
Collaborator

Signed-off-by: Juraci Paixão Kröhling [email protected]

Which problem is this PR solving?

Short description of the changes

Signed-off-by: Juraci Paixão Kröhling <[email protected]>
@ghost ghost assigned jpkrohling Jun 19, 2018
@ghost ghost added the review label Jun 19, 2018
@jpkrohling
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'm bumping Thrift in spite of what was discussed on #326 because I remember @objectiser mentioning that 0.11.0 is what the C++ library is using. If this is still deemed as not appropriate, I'll revert this version bump.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 19, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #458 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #458   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     88.24%   88.24%           
  Complexity      488      488           
=========================================
  Files            63       63           
  Lines          1846     1846           
  Branches        240      240           
=========================================
  Hits           1629     1629           
  Misses          139      139           
  Partials         78       78

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8b87ab7...331bc04. Read the comment docs.

@jpkrohling jpkrohling merged commit 331bc04 into jaegertracing:master Jun 19, 2018
@ghost ghost removed the review label Jun 19, 2018
relocate 'com.twitter' , 'jaeger.com.twitter'
relocate 'okhttp' , 'jaeger.okhttp'
relocate 'okio' , 'jaeger.okio'
relocate 'org.apache' , 'jaeger.org.apache'
classifier 'shadow'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought the idea was to make it the main artifact, not have a classifier?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point, I think that's indeed what we discussed last Friday.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Created #460 and #461

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants