Add Relative Volume Error metric
#2
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ce (RVE) in % between the prediction and the reference.
- if both reference and prediction are empty --> model learned correctly --> setting 0 representing no over- or under-segmentation - if reference is empty, prediction is not empty --> model did not learn correctly --> setting positive value representing overestimation
naga-karthik
approved these changes
Apr 30, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a new metric,
Relative Volume Error.If the prediction is smaller than the reference, the relative volume difference is negative.
If the prediction is larger than the reference, the relative volume difference is positive.
Note: this is a duplication of valosekj#1, which was, however, opened on my fork.