Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(system-e2e): Add test for admin delegations #17536

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

GunnlaugurG
Copy link
Member

@GunnlaugurG GunnlaugurG commented Jan 16, 2025

...

Attach a link to issue if relevant

What

Specify what you're trying to achieve

Why

Specify why you need to achieve this

Screenshots / Gifs

Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added end-to-end tests for admin portal delegation functionality
    • Introduced data test ID for create delegation button to improve testability
  • Tests

    • Created new test suite for verifying admin delegation page elements
    • Implemented test to check visibility of "Add" button in delegation admin page

@GunnlaugurG GunnlaugurG requested a review from a team as a code owner January 16, 2025 16:28
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces an end-to-end test for the admin portal's delegation functionality and adds a data test ID to a button in the delegation admin interface. The changes focus on improving testability by adding a specific test identifier to the "Add" button and creating a Playwright test to verify the button's presence and visibility in the admin delegations screen.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/admin-portal/smoke/admin-delegations.spec.ts Added new end-to-end test for admin delegations, using Playwright to verify the "Add" button visibility
libs/portals/admin/delegation-admin/src/screens/Root.tsx Added dataTestId="create-delegation-button" to the button for improved test targeting

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test as E2E Test
    participant Browser as Browser Context
    participant AdminPortal as Admin Portal Page
    
    Test->>Browser: Initialize session
    Browser->>AdminPortal: Navigate to delegations page
    Test->>AdminPortal: Verify "Add" button presence
    AdminPortal-->>Test: Confirm button visibility
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

automerge

Suggested reviewers

  • magnearun

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/admin-portal/smoke/admin-delegations.spec.ts (2)

24-28: Enhance test coverage and description.

The test case could be more comprehensive and descriptive:

  1. The test name should better describe the scenario being tested
  2. Additional assertions should verify the button's functionality
-    test('should see "Add" button', async () => {
+    test('should display and enable "Add" button for admin with write access', async () => {
       const page = await context.newPage()
       await page.goto('/stjornbord/delegation-admin')
-      await expect(page.getByText('Skrá nýtt umboð')).toBeVisible()
+      const addButton = page.getByTestId('create-delegation-button')
+      await expect(addButton).toBeVisible()
+      await expect(addButton).toBeEnabled()
+      await expect(addButton).toHaveText('Skrá nýtt umboð')
     })

11-22: Consider adding negative test cases.

The test suite only covers the happy path. Consider adding test cases for:

  • Admin without write access
  • Unauthenticated users
  • Session timeout scenarios
libs/portals/admin/delegation-admin/src/screens/Root.tsx (1)

65-65: LGTM! Consider using a constant for the test ID.

The addition of the test ID is good. To improve maintainability, consider extracting test IDs into a constants file that can be shared between the component and tests.

// testIds.ts
export const DELEGATION_TEST_IDS = {
  CREATE_BUTTON: 'create-delegation-button',
} as const;

Then in the component:

-                dataTestId="create-delegation-button"
+                dataTestId={DELEGATION_TEST_IDS.CREATE_BUTTON}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 58b89c1 and 9456674.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/admin-portal/smoke/admin-delegations.spec.ts (1 hunks)
  • libs/portals/admin/delegation-admin/src/screens/Root.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/admin-portal/smoke/admin-delegations.spec.ts (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
libs/portals/admin/delegation-admin/src/screens/Root.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
📓 Learnings (1)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/admin-portal/smoke/admin-delegations.spec.ts (1)
Learnt from: saevarma
PR: island-is/island.is#16257
File: apps/services/auth/admin-api/src/app/v2/delegations/test/delegation-admin.auth.spec.ts:178-201
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:20.157Z
Learning: In `apps/services/auth/admin-api/src/app/v2/delegations/test/delegation-admin.auth.spec.ts`, ensure that test case names accurately describe the scenario being tested, particularly in cases involving invalid request signatures.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

Datadog Report

All test runs 3c3f490 🔗

9 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 9 Passed
⬆️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 increased (+0.03%), 13 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
judicial-system-api 0 0 0 61 0 7.3s 1 increased (+0.03%) Link
judicial-system-backend 0 0 0 21112 0 26m 2.49s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-formatters 0 0 0 38 0 5.93s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-message 0 0 0 41 0 12.78s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-message-handler 0 0 0 4 0 4.01s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-scheduler 0 0 0 4 0 4.39s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-types 0 0 0 23 0 7.64s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-web 0 0 0 333 0 1m 13.4s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-xrd-api 0 0 0 6 0 5.3s 1 no change Link

@GunnlaugurG GunnlaugurG added the autoupdate Branch gets auto updated label Jan 23, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 35.61%. Comparing base (49e2b3a) to head (9456674).
Report is 78 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #17536   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   35.61%   35.61%           
=======================================
  Files        7015     7015           
  Lines      150339   150339           
  Branches    42981    42981           
=======================================
  Hits        53541    53541           
  Misses      96798    96798           

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 49e2b3a...9456674. Read the comment docs.

@GunnlaugurG GunnlaugurG added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 23, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 93980d0 Jan 23, 2025
62 checks passed
@GunnlaugurG GunnlaugurG deleted the feat/add-e2e-for-delegations-admin branch January 23, 2025 09:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
autoupdate Branch gets auto updated
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants