-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(j-s): Add initial delay for judicial-system-web
startup probe
#16802
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the readiness configuration of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
charts/judicial-system/values.dev.yaml (1)
535-535
: Consider standardizing timeouts across similar services.Other services in the cluster are using 3-second timeouts. Consider analyzing their startup behavior to determine if they would also benefit from increased timeouts, especially services with similar resource constraints and initialization needs.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
apps/judicial-system/web/infra/judicial-system-web.ts
(1 hunks)charts/judicial-system/values.dev.yaml
(1 hunks)charts/judicial-system/values.prod.yaml
(1 hunks)charts/judicial-system/values.staging.yaml
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/infra/judicial-system-web.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (6)
apps/judicial-system/web/infra/judicial-system-web.ts (2)
24-24
: Consider adding startupProbe as mentioned in PR title.
The PR title mentions adding an initial delay for the startup probe, but the changes only modify the readiness probe. Consider adding a startupProbe
configuration if the intention is to handle initial application startup differently from regular readiness checks.
Let's check if any other services use startupProbe that we can reference:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for existing startupProbe configurations in the codebase
# Expected: Find examples of startupProbe usage if any
echo "Checking for existing startupProbe configurations:"
rg -B 2 -A 2 "startupProbe" "apps/**/*.ts"
24-24
: LGTM! Verify alignment with environment configurations.
The change from a simple string to an object with timeoutSeconds: 10
is a good improvement for the readiness probe configuration.
Let's verify this aligns with the environment configurations:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! The readiness probe configuration is aligned with environment values
The 10-second timeout value in the readiness probe configuration is consistent with the environment configurations in the Helm charts. Looking at the values files:
charts/judicial-system/values.dev.yaml
: readiness path: '/readiness', timeoutSeconds: 10charts/judicial-system/values.staging.yaml
: readiness path: '/readiness', timeoutSeconds: 10charts/judicial-system/values.prod.yaml
: readiness path: '/readiness', timeoutSeconds: 10
The change is properly reflected across all environments.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the timeout value matches across all environment files
# Expected: Should find timeoutSeconds: 10 in all environment value files
echo "Checking readiness probe timeout in environment files:"
rg -A 2 "readiness" "**/values*.yaml"
Length of output: 300
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more precise search for the infrastructure files
echo "Searching for all infrastructure and configuration files:"
fd -e ts -e yaml "judicial-system-web|values"
echo -e "\nChecking readiness probe configurations:"
rg -B 2 -A 2 "readiness"
Length of output: 82563
charts/judicial-system/values.dev.yaml (1)
535-535
: LGTM! Consider monitoring startup performance.
Increasing the readiness probe timeout from 3 to 10 seconds is reasonable for web applications that might need more time during startup. However, it would be beneficial to monitor the actual startup time to ensure there aren't underlying performance issues causing slow startups.
✅ Verification successful
Timeout increase is consistent with infrastructure patterns
The 10-second readiness probe timeout for the judicial-system-web service is aligned with the infrastructure patterns, as evidenced by:
- The same 10-second timeout is configured in both staging and production environments
- The change is defined in the infrastructure code at
apps/judicial-system/web/infra/judicial-system-web.ts
- Most other services use a 3-second timeout, but web applications often need more time for initial startup
The increased timeout is appropriate for this specific web service while monitoring startup performance remains a good practice.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if other services have similar timeouts
echo "Services with 3-second timeouts that might need adjustment:"
rg "timeoutSeconds: 3" -B 2 | grep -B 2 "readiness:"
Length of output: 975
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual values in production and staging environments
echo "Checking timeout values across environments:"
fd "values\.(prod|staging|dev)\.ya?ml$" --exec grep -B 3 "timeoutSeconds:"
# Also check if there are any other timeout configurations
echo -e "\nChecking all timeout configurations in the codebase:"
rg "timeoutSeconds:" -B 2
Length of output: 90355
charts/judicial-system/values.staging.yaml (1)
535-535
: LGTM! Increasing readiness probe timeout.
The increase in readiness probe timeout from 3s to 10s for the judicial-system-web component is appropriate for services that might need additional time to initialize.
Let's verify that this change is consistent across other environment configurations:
charts/judicial-system/values.prod.yaml (2)
535-535
: Verify the root cause for increased readiness probe timeout
The timeout increase from 3s to 10s is significant. While this change will give the service more time to become ready, such a large increase might be masking underlying performance issues.
#!/bin/bash
# Check startup logs for potential slowness indicators
rg -A 5 "judicial-system-web.*(?i)(slow|delay|timeout|failed)"
Line range hint 615-616
: Review the significant CPU request reduction
The CPU request has been reduced from 200m to 15m (92.5% reduction). This dramatic decrease raises concerns:
- Potential resource starvation under load
- Inconsistency with staging environment (200m)
Please provide justification for this reduction and confirm that performance testing has validated this change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16802 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 36.53% 36.53%
=======================================
Files 6892 6892
Lines 143920 143920
Branches 40997 40997
=======================================
Hits 52586 52586
Misses 91334 91334
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
…#16802) * Add initial delay. * chore: charts update dirty files --------- Co-authored-by: andes-it <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Róberta Andersen <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation