chore(j-s): Court Autofill #15421
chore(j-s): Court Autofill #15421
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates enhance the logic for determining the state and court assignment of cases based on whether they are request cases, streamline conditions for indictment cases, and refine the retrieval of user and institution information in the frontend. These changes ensure more accurate and context-sensitive handling of various case types across different modules. Changes
Sequence DiagramssequenceDiagram
participant Frontend as User Interface
participant BService as Backend Service
participant Database as Database
Note over Frontend, BService: Case Creation Process
Frontend->>BService: Create Case (isRequestCase, caseType)
BService->>BService: Determine State and courtId
BService->>Database: Store Case (with state and courtId)
Database-->>BService: Confirmation
BService-->>Frontend: Case Created
Note over Frontend, BService: Case Update Process
Frontend->>BService: Update Case (caseType)
BService->>BService: Evaluate indictment conditions
BService->>Database: Update Case
Database-->>BService: Confirmation
BService-->>Frontend: Case Updated
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/case.service.ts (6 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/internalCase.service.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/UserProvider/currentUser.graphql (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (4)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/UserProvider/currentUser.graphql (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/internalCase.service.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/case.service.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
Learnings (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx (1)
Learnt from: unakb PR: island-is/island.is#15378 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100 Timestamp: 2024-06-27T14:37:07.823Z Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.
Additional comments not posted (8)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx (2)
19-19: Ensure theUserContextimport is correct and available.The
UserContextis imported but its definition is not provided. Ensure it is correctly defined and exported from the referenced module.Verification successful
The
UserContextis correctly defined and exported.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/UserProvider/UserProvider.tsx:export const UserContext = createContext<UserProvider>({})Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and export of `UserContext`. # Test: Search for the definition of `UserContext`. Expect: `UserContext` to be defined and exported. rg --type typescript 'export const UserContext'Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and export of `UserContext`. # Test: Search for the definition of `UserContext`. Expect: `UserContext` to be defined and exported. rg 'export const UserContext'Length of output: 248
31-31: Ensure theuseOnceOnimport is correct and available.The
useOnceOnhook is imported but its definition is not provided. Ensure it is correctly defined and exported from the referenced module.Verification successful
The
useOnceOnhook is correctly defined and exported.The
useOnceOnhook is defined inapps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/hooks/useOnceOn/index.tsand is exported as the default export. Additionally, it is re-exported fromapps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/hooks/index.ts.
- Definition:
apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/hooks/useOnceOn/index.ts- Default Export:
apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/hooks/useOnceOn/index.ts- Re-export:
apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/hooks/index.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and export of `useOnceOn`. # Test: Search for the definition of `useOnceOn`. Expect: `useOnceOn` to be defined and exported. rg --type typescript 'export const useOnceOn'Length of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and export of `useOnceOn`. # Test: Search for the definition of `useOnceOn`. Expect: `useOnceOn` to be defined and exported. rg --type ts 'export const useOnceOn'Length of output: 39
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and export of `useOnceOn`. # Test: Search for the term `useOnceOn` to verify its definition and export. rg 'useOnceOn'Length of output: 2837
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/internalCase.service.ts (3)
33-33: Ensure theisRequestCaseimport is correct and available.The
isRequestCasefunction is imported but its definition is not provided. Ensure it is correctly defined and exported from the referenced module.Verification successful
The
isRequestCaseimport is correct and available.The function
isRequestCaseis defined and exported inlibs/judicial-system/types/src/lib/case.ts, confirming that the import ininternalCase.service.tsis valid.
libs/judicial-system/types/src/lib/case.ts:export const isRequestCase = (type?: CaseType | null): boolean => {Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and export of `isRequestCase`. # Test: Search for the definition of `isRequestCase`. Expect: `isRequestCase` to be defined and exported. rg --type typescript 'export const isRequestCase'Length of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and export of `isRequestCase`. # Test: Search for the definition of `isRequestCase`. Expect: `isRequestCase` to be defined and exported. rg 'export const isRequestCase'Length of output: 307
357-359: Ensure the state assignment logic for request cases is correct.The state assignment for request cases is set to
CaseState.NEW. Verify that this change aligns with the overall case management logic.Verification successful
The state assignment logic for request cases is correct and consistent.
The usage of
isRequestCaseto assignCaseState.NEWto request cases is consistent across the codebase.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/internalCase.service.tsapps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/case.service.tsapps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/state/case.state.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the state assignment logic for request cases. # Test: Search for all occurrences of `isRequestCase` usage. Expect: Consistent state assignment logic. rg --type typescript 'isRequestCase'Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the state assignment logic for request cases. # Test: Search for all occurrences of `isRequestCase` usage. Expect: Consistent state assignment logic. rg --type ts 'isRequestCase'Length of output: 3469
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract and review the state assignment logic for request cases. # Extract lines around the usage of `isRequestCase` in relevant files. rg --type ts -C 5 'isRequestCase' apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/internalCase.service.ts apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/case.service.ts apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/state/case.state.tsLength of output: 9971
364-366: Ensure thecourtIdassignment logic for request cases is correct.The
courtIdassignment for request cases is set to the creator's institution's default court ID. Verify that this change aligns with the overall case management logic.Verification successful
Verified the
courtIdassignment logic for request cases.The
courtIdassignment for request cases is consistent with the overall case management logic. TheisRequestCasefunction correctly identifies request cases, and the use ofcreator.institution?.defaultCourtIdensures the appropriate court ID is assigned.
- The
isRequestCasefunction is defined inlibs/judicial-system/types/src/lib/case.ts.- The
courtIdassignment logic ininternalCase.service.tsaligns with the expected behavior.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `courtId` assignment logic for request cases. # Test: Search for all occurrences of `courtId` assignment. Expect: Consistent assignment logic. rg --type typescript 'courtId'Length of output: 65
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `courtId` assignment logic for request cases. # Test: Search for all occurrences of `courtId` assignment. Expect: Consistent assignment logic. rg --type ts 'courtId'Length of output: 30471
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the implementation of `isRequestCase` ast-grep --lang ts --pattern 'function isRequestCase($_) { $$$ }' # Extract the context around the `courtId` assignment in `internalCase.service.ts` rg --context 10 'courtId' apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/internalCase.service.tsLength of output: 4383
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the implementation of `isRequestCase` rg 'function isRequestCase' --type ts # Check the usage of `creator.institution?.defaultCourtId` rg 'creator.institution?.defaultCourtId' --type tsLength of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the usage of `isRequestCase` rg 'isRequestCase' --type ts # Search for the usage of `defaultCourtId` rg 'defaultCourtId' --type ts # List all function definitions in TypeScript files to locate `isRequestCase` rg 'function ' --type tsLength of output: 106930
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the implementation of `isRequestCase` from `case.ts` rg --context 10 'export const isRequestCase' libs/judicial-system/types/src/lib/case.ts # Review the context around the usage of `defaultCourtId` in `internalCase.service.ts` rg --context 10 'defaultCourtId' apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/internalCase.service.tsLength of output: 2444
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/case.service.ts (3)
1211-1211: LGTM!The changes improve readability and correctness.
Also applies to: 1226-1226, 1236-1236
1330-1332: Verify function usage forcreate.Ensure that all calls to
createcorrectly handle the new logic introduced byisRequestCase.
452-454: Verify function usage forcreateCase.Ensure that all calls to
createCasecorrectly handle the new logic introduced byisRequestCase.Verification successful
Verify function usage for
createCase.The implementation of the
createCasefunction correctly integrates the logic forisRequestCase. The function sets the state toCaseState.NEWorCaseState.DRAFTbased on the result ofisRequestCase. The invocations ofcreateCaseincase.service.tsalso appropriately handle this logic.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/case.service.ts:
- Line 452: The state is set based on
isRequestCase.The integration and usage of the new logic introduced by
isRequestCaseare consistent and correctly handled in the relevant code segments.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `createCase` handle the new logic introduced by `isRequestCase`. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct handling of `isRequestCase`. rg --type ts $'createCase'Length of output: 18558
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract and examine the relevant code segments where `createCase` is invoked to ensure correct handling of `isRequestCase`. # Extracting the relevant code segments from the backend service file echo "Extracting invocations of createCase in case.service.ts..." rg --context 5 'createCase' apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/case.service.ts # Extracting the relevant code segments from other related files echo "Extracting invocations of createCase in related files..." rg --context 5 'createCase' apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/court/court.service.ts rg --context 5 'createCase' apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/court/test/createCourtCase.spec.ts rg --context 5 'createCase' apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/test/caseController/create.spec.tsLength of output: 5092
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract and analyze the complete `createCase` function implementation and its invocations to ensure correct handling of `isRequestCase`. # Extracting the complete `createCase` function implementation from case.service.ts echo "Extracting the complete createCase function implementation from case.service.ts..." ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'class CaseService { $$$ private async createCase(caseToCreate: CreateCaseDto, transaction: Transaction): Promise<string> { $$$ } $$$ }' apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/case.service.tsLength of output: 148824
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/UserProvider/currentUser.graphql
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #15421 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 37.02% 37.03% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 6540 6540
Lines 133692 133273 -419
Branches 38246 38210 -36
==========================================
- Hits 49496 49362 -134
+ Misses 84196 83911 -285
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 200 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 2 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 2 Passed Test Services
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/test/caseController/create.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
58-58: Fix the assertion to removecourtId.The
courtIdshould be removed from theexpectstatement to align with the new logic.- courtId,apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/test/internalCaseController/create.spec.ts (2)
Line range hint
56-56: Fix the assertion to removecourtId.The
courtIdshould be removed from theexpectstatement to align with the new logic.- courtId,
Line range hint
190-190: Fix the assertion to removecourtId.The
courtIdshould be removed from theexpectstatement to align with the new logic.- courtId,
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/test/caseController/create.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/test/internalCaseController/create.spec.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (2)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/test/caseController/create.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/test/internalCaseController/create.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
Additional comments not posted (12)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/test/caseController/create.spec.ts (4)
Line range hint
73-73: LGTM!The changes align with the new logic.
Line range hint
84-84: LGTM!The changes align with the new logic.
Line range hint
101-101: LGTM!The changes align with the new logic.
Line range hint
117-117: LGTM!The changes align with the new logic.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/test/internalCaseController/create.spec.ts (8)
Line range hint
84-84: LGTM!The changes align with the new logic.
Line range hint
107-107: LGTM!The changes align with the new logic.
Line range hint
130-130: LGTM!The changes align with the new logic.
Line range hint
160-160: LGTM!The changes align with the new logic.
Line range hint
210-210: LGTM!The changes align with the new logic.
Line range hint
226-226: LGTM!The changes align with the new logic.
Line range hint
247-247: LGTM!The changes align with the new logic.
Line range hint
268-268: LGTM!The changes align with the new logic.
* Delays indictment case court autofill until court selection screen * Updates tests --------- Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Court Autofill
Autofilla dómstól þegar farið er á málsmeðferðar skjá
What
Why
Screenshots / Gifs
Before court selection
After court selection
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Tests