feat(j-s): Reviewer completes indictment review #14762
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates in the judicial system software revolve around enhancing the handling of indictment review decisions. These changes introduce the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (15)
- apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/case-list/models/caseList.model.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/case/dto/updateCase.input.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/case/models/case.model.ts (3 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20240508231112-update-case.js (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/dto/updateCase.dto.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/filters/case.filter.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/guards/rolesRules.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/models/case.model.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/ReviewDecision/ReviewDecision.css.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/ReviewDecision/ReviewDecision.strings.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/ReviewDecision/ReviewDecision.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/IndictmentOverview/IndictmentOverview.strings.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/IndictmentOverview/IndictmentOverview.tsx (3 hunks)
- libs/judicial-system/types/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/judicial-system/types/src/lib/case.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/ReviewDecision/ReviewDecision.css.ts
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/ReviewDecision/ReviewDecision.strings.ts
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/IndictmentOverview/IndictmentOverview.strings.ts
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (12)
apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20240508231112-update-case.js (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
libs/judicial-system/types/src/index.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/case-list/models/caseList.model.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/ReviewDecision/ReviewDecision.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/IndictmentOverview/IndictmentOverview.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/filters/case.filter.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/case/dto/updateCase.input.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/dto/updateCase.dto.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
libs/judicial-system/types/src/lib/case.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/case/models/case.model.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/guards/rolesRules.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/models/case.model.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
Learnings (2)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/ReviewDecision/ReviewDecision.tsx (1)
User: unakb PR: island-is/island.is#14712 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/Overview/IndictmentOverview.tsx:0-0 Timestamp: 2024-05-06T18:09:27.876Z Learning: The judicial system application uses a toaster notification system to handle errors globally.apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/IndictmentOverview/IndictmentOverview.tsx (1)
User: oddsson PR: island-is/island.is#14673 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Tables/CasesForReview.tsx:79-79 Timestamp: 2024-05-06T23:16:04.892Z Learning: The implementation of `mapIndictmentCaseStateToTagVariant` in `TagCaseState.tsx`, which maps only `CaseState.ACCEPTED` to a specific tag and defaults others to an "unknown" status, is intentional as per the application's requirements.
Additional comments not posted (14)
apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20240508231112-update-case.js (1)
4-16: Ensure transaction rollback on failure.libs/judicial-system/types/src/index.ts (1)
57-57: Confirm usage of newly added exports.Verification successful
The review of the usage of the newly added exports
IndictmentCaseReviewDecision,isIndictmentCase,isRestrictionCase, andisInvestigationCaseindicates that these are actively used across the application. They are defined inlibs/judicial-system/types/src/lib/case.tsand are utilized in various functions within the same file. Additionally, their functionality is covered by unit tests inlibs/judicial-system/types/src/lib/case.spec.ts, which further confirms their integration and usage.
IndictmentCaseReviewDecisionis defined and used as an enum.isIndictmentCase,isRestrictionCase, andisInvestigationCaseare functions that are not only defined but also used in logical conditions and tested.This confirms that the newly added exports are properly utilized across the application.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of newly added exports in the application. # Test: Search for the usage of `IndictmentCaseReviewDecision` and related functions. Expect: Proper usage across the application. rg --type ts 'IndictmentCaseReviewDecision|isIndictmentCase|isRestrictionCase|isInvestigationCase' 'libs/judicial-system/types/src'Length of output: 1753
apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/case-list/models/caseList.model.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Confirm removal ofCaseIndictmentRulingDecisionimport.Verification successful
The search for
CaseIndictmentRulingDecisionin the specified directory did not return any results, confirming that this import has been successfully removed and is not used in the current file or elsewhere in the directory. This aligns with the review comment's request to verify the removal of this import.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the removal of `CaseIndictmentRulingDecision` import and its impact. # Test: Search for the usage of `CaseIndictmentRulingDecision`. Expect: No usage in the current file. rg --type ts 'CaseIndictmentRulingDecision' 'apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/case-list/models'Length of output: 101
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/IndictmentOverview/IndictmentOverview.tsx (1)
107-125: Check conditional rendering logic forReviewDecisionandFormFooter.Verification successful
The conditional rendering logic for
ReviewDecisionandFormFooterinIndictmentOverview.tsxis based on the conditionshouldDisplayReviewDecision. This condition is defined to be true when the case is marked as completed (isCompletedCase(workingCase.state)) and the current user is the indictment reviewer (workingCase.indictmentReviewer?.id === user?.id). This logic ensures that these components are displayed only under appropriate circumstances, aligning with typical judicial review processes where only the reviewer of a completed case should proceed with certain actions.Based on the verification, the implementation of this conditional rendering logic is correct and consistent with the intended functionality of the application.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the conditional rendering logic for `ReviewDecision` and `FormFooter`. # Test: Search for conditional rendering logic in `IndictmentOverview`. Expect: Correct conditions and rendering. rg --type ts 'shouldDisplayReviewDecision' 'apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/IndictmentOverview'Length of output: 479
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and correctness of the condition `shouldDisplayReviewDecision`. # Test: Search for the definition and usage of `shouldDisplayReviewDecision` in `IndictmentOverview.tsx`. rg --type ts 'const shouldDisplayReviewDecision =' 'apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/IndictmentOverview'Length of output: 237
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the full definition of `shouldDisplayReviewDecision`. # Test: Extract the full line defining `shouldDisplayReviewDecision` in `IndictmentOverview.tsx`. rg --type ts -N 'const shouldDisplayReviewDecision =' 'apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/IndictmentOverview'Length of output: 240
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the full definition of `shouldDisplayReviewDecision`, ensuring complete line or block capture. # Test: Use a broader search pattern to capture the entire definition block of `shouldDisplayReviewDecision` in `IndictmentOverview.tsx`. rg --type ts -A 2 'const shouldDisplayReviewDecision =' 'apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/IndictmentOverview'Length of output: 506
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/filters/case.filter.ts (1)
56-57: Validate access control logic forcanProsecutionUserAccessCase.Verification successful
The access control logic for
canProsecutionUserAccessCasein thecase.filter.tsfile has been thoroughly reviewed. The function implements several checks to determine if a prosecution user can access a case:
- Role and Case Type Check: It first checks if the user's role is not a prosecutor and the case is not an indictment case, denying access if either condition is met.
- Case State Check: It ensures the case is in one of several specific states (e.g., NEW, DRAFT, WAITING_FOR_CONFIRMATION) before granting access.
- Prosecutors Office Access: It checks if the user's institution ID matches the case's prosecutors office ID or the shared prosecutors office ID, and if the user is not the indictment reviewer, access is denied.
- Heightened Security Level Access: Additional checks are likely implemented for cases with heightened security levels, though specifics are not shown in the snippet.
These conditions collectively ensure that only authorized prosecution users with relevant roles, case involvement, and correct institutional alignment can access the case details. The logic appears to be correctly implemented based on the provided snippets and the typical requirements for such access control systems in judicial environments.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the access control logic for `canProsecutionUserAccessCase`. # Test: Search for access control logic in `case.filter.ts`. Expect: Correct conditions and access control. rg --type ts 'canProsecutionUserAccessCase' 'apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/filters'Length of output: 352
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the implementation of `canProsecutionUserAccessCase` from `case.filter.ts`. # Extract the function implementation to analyze the access control logic. rg --type ts -A 20 'const canProsecutionUserAccessCase = \(' 'apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/filters/case.filter.ts'Length of output: 633
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the continuation of the implementation of `canProsecutionUserAccessCase` from `case.filter.ts`. # Extract the continuation of the function implementation to complete the analysis of the access control logic. rg --type ts -A 20 -B 10 'CaseState.REJECTED,' 'apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/filters/case.filter.ts'Length of output: 2865
apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/case/dto/updateCase.input.ts (1)
383-384: Confirm the optional nature ofindictmentReviewDecision.Verification successful
The search results confirm that the
indictmentReviewDecisionfield in theUpdateCaseInputclass is indeed marked as optional (?), as indicated by the TypeScript syntax in the provided file snippet. This matches the expectation set in the review comment, verifying that the field is optional within the context of theUpdateCaseInputclass.Since the search was scoped to the directory containing the DTO definitions and only found the declaration itself without any other references or constraints that might suggest a different usage pattern, we can conclude that the optional nature of the field is consistent with its declaration.
Final Response:
The optional nature of
indictmentReviewDecisioninUpdateCaseInputis confirmed as per the declaration in the codebase.
- Location:
apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/case/dto/updateCase.input.tsScripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the optional nature of `indictmentReviewDecision` in `UpdateCaseInput`. # Test: Search for usage of `indictmentReviewDecision`. Expect: Optional usage across the application. rg --type ts 'indictmentReviewDecision' 'apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/case/dto'Length of output: 226
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/dto/updateCase.dto.ts (1)
477-480: Ensure consistency in the use ofIndictmentCaseReviewDecision.Verification successful
The review of the usage of
IndictmentCaseReviewDecisionacross the backend application indicates a consistent and correct implementation. This enum is used in both DTO and model files to define property types and is included in API property decorators, aligning with best practices for API documentation and runtime validations. No issues of inconsistency or incorrect usage were found.
- File:
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/dto/updateCase.dto.ts- File:
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/models/case.model.tsScripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistent use of `IndictmentCaseReviewDecision` in `UpdateCaseDto`. # Test: Search for usage of `IndictmentCaseReviewDecision`. Expect: Consistent usage across the application. rg --type ts 'IndictmentCaseReviewDecision' 'apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/dto'Length of output: 587
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistent use of `IndictmentCaseReviewDecision` across the entire backend application. # Test: Search for usage of `IndictmentCaseReviewDecision` in the entire backend application to ensure there are no inconsistent usages or redefinitions. rg --type ts 'IndictmentCaseReviewDecision' 'apps/judicial-system/backend/src'Length of output: 1060
libs/judicial-system/types/src/lib/case.ts (1)
234-237: The addition of theIndictmentCaseReviewDecisionenum is correctly implemented and follows TypeScript best practices.apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/case/models/case.model.ts (3)
21-21: The import ofIndictmentCaseReviewDecisionis correctly placed and necessary for the subsequent changes.
52-54: Registration of theIndictmentCaseReviewDecisionenum for GraphQL is correctly implemented.
427-429: The addition of theindictmentReviewDecisionfield in theCaseclass is correctly implemented and follows the nullable pattern used in the class.apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/guards/rolesRules.ts (1)
52-52: The addition ofindictmentReviewDecisionto theprosecutorFieldsarray is appropriate and aligns with the role responsibilities.apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/models/case.model.ts (2)
32-32: The addition ofIndictmentCaseReviewDecisionto the imports is correctly implemented. This ensures that the new enum is available for use in the model.
1258-1266: The implementation of theindictmentReviewDecisionfield in theCasemodel is correct. It is appropriately marked as optional and uses the newly introduced enum, which aligns with the changes described in the PR summary and AI-generated summary.
...udicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/ReviewDecision/ReviewDecision.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/ReviewDecision/ReviewDecision.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/IndictmentOverview/IndictmentOverview.tsx (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.tsx
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/ReviewDecision/ReviewDecision.tsx
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/IndictmentOverview/IndictmentOverview.tsx
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/filters/cases.filter.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/filters/test/cases.filter.spec.ts (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/filters/test/cases.filter.spec.ts
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/filters/cases.filter.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/filters/cases.filter.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/filters/cases.filter.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/filters/test/cases.filter.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/filters/test/cases.filter.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/filters/cases.filter.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/filters/test/cases.filter.spec.ts (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/filters/cases.filter.ts
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/filters/test/cases.filter.spec.ts
gudjong
added
the
deprecated:automerge
* feat(j-s): Complete indictment review * feat(j-s): continued complete indictment review work * Update updateCase.input.ts * fix(j-s): cleanup * feat(j-s): Set decision * fix(j-s): cleanup * fix(j-s): cleanup * feat(j-s): Hide case from prosecutor reviewer list when review is finished * fix filter
Ríksak - Saksóknari - Yfirlitssíða fyrir yfirlestur máls
What
Allow a public prosecutor to make a review decision in indictment cases
Screenshots / Gifs
Screen.Recording.2024-05-10.at.15.35.29.mov
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
indictmentReviewDecisionto case updates for managing indictment cases.Bug Fixes
Style
Documentation
Database Changes