Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RS expansion not returns address prefix ranges? #543

Closed
sumkincpp opened this issue Aug 27, 2021 · 3 comments · Fixed by #544
Closed

RS expansion not returns address prefix ranges? #543

sumkincpp opened this issue Aug 27, 2021 · 3 comments · Fixed by #544
Assignees
Labels
backport Should be backported to previous releases bug Something isn't working release blocker blocks the next release
Milestone

Comments

@sumkincpp
Copy link

sumkincpp commented Aug 27, 2021

Describe the bug
It seems, that RS-Expansion does not return address prefix ranges.

To Reproduce

$ echo '!v' | nc rr.ntt.net 43
A22
IRRd -- version 4.1.4
C
$ echo '!iRS-36327' | nc rr.ntt.net 43
A409
142.4.128.0/19^19-24 192.211.128.0/17^17-24 198.100.192.0/18^18-24 198.41.80.0/20^20-24 199.167.80.0/21^21-24 199.27.88.0/22^22-24 199.48.72.0/21^21-24 199.66.160.0/21^21-24 208.68.0.0/22^22-24 208.69.64.0/21^21-24 208.73.128.0/21^21-24 208.80.240.0/21^21-24 208.86.100.0/22^22-24 208.88.216.0/21^21-24 208.95.24.0/21^21-24 216.80.5.0/24 216.80.55.0/24 216.80.6.0/24 23.232.0.0/17^17-24 74.119.152.0/21^21-24
C
$ echo '!iRS-36327,1' | nc rr.ntt.net 43
A43
216.80.5.0/24 216.80.55.0/24 216.80.6.0/24
C

Expected behaviour

This expansion should also return address prefix ranges

$ echo '!iRS-36327,1' | nc rr.ntt.net 43

RADB: works as expected

IRRd version you are running
4.1.4

Relevant places
Members are being tested as IP-Addresses:

IP(sub_member)

@mxsasha mxsasha self-assigned this Aug 28, 2021
@mxsasha mxsasha added backport Should be backported to previous releases bug Something isn't working release blocker blocks the next release labels Aug 28, 2021
@mxsasha mxsasha added this to the Release 4.2 milestone Aug 28, 2021
@mxsasha
Copy link
Collaborator

mxsasha commented Aug 28, 2021

This indeed looks like a bug and you are right about where it is. Curious, because this was introduced in 86baffd which was already in 4.0, and we did run comparisons between legacy IRRd and this. Must be somewhat rare.

@mxsasha
Copy link
Collaborator

mxsasha commented Aug 30, 2021

Still needs backport to 4.1

@mxsasha mxsasha reopened this Aug 30, 2021
mxsasha added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 30, 2021
mxsasha added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 30, 2021
@mxsasha
Copy link
Collaborator

mxsasha commented Aug 30, 2021

Released in 4.1.6, thanks!

@mxsasha mxsasha closed this as completed Aug 30, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport Should be backported to previous releases bug Something isn't working release blocker blocks the next release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants