-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cleanup and update the tools installation in Makefile
#67
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you please also give a meaningful PR title + PR description.
Addressed all review comments. Good to merge ahead. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a blank line in the very beginning of this file. It can also be removed.
Makefile
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
another changes are required
One note regarding the tool installation helper. This approach has beed discarded by the k8s community in favor of a simpler approach which we are actually using across all our project: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder/blob/master/pkg/plugins/golang/v4/scaffolds/internal/templates/makefile.go I would suggest we stick to the same in the |
i think we can align with it but in another issue. But i want to keep our solution for installation of binary tools with golang because it is more flexible. They still doesn't have properly check of version for linter. |
@truptikat88 Could you please sign rest of your commits as well. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR @truptikat88, and sorry for the late review, just an optional comment in lined.
Have you been able to test the changed targets in your local env?
2a2cea3
to
bdebf07
Compare
bdebf07
to
d81161f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@hardikdr this PR has many commits and i didn't check quality of commit messages. I don't know what is current merge strategy but i suggest do squash before merge. |
Sure, @lukasfrank mentioned he would like to take a look as well, let's wait for him. |
Proposed Changes
Fixes #24