Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 11, 2021. It is now read-only.

Adapted to new ipfs-repo API #84

Merged
daviddias merged 2 commits into from
Jul 4, 2017
Merged

Adapted to new ipfs-repo API #84

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
8092378
adapted to new ipfs-repo API
pgte Jun 29, 2017
36834c3
fix: MemoryDatastore does not require options
pgte Jul 4, 2017
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
19 changes: 17 additions & 2 deletions src/index.js
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -356,9 +356,24 @@ class IPLDResolver {
* @returns {void}
*/
IPLDResolver.inMemory = function (callback) {
const Memdown = require('memdown')
const repo = new IPFSRepo('in-memory', {
fs: MemoryStore,
level: require('memdown'),
storageBackends: {
root: MemoryStore,
blocks: MemoryStore,
datastore: MemoryStore
},
storageBackendOptions: {
root: {
db: Memdown
},
blocks: {
db: Memdown
},
datastore: {
db: Memdown
}
},
Copy link
Member

@daviddias daviddias Jul 4, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pgte is this correct?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@pgte pgte Jul 4, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@diasdavid looks like it. I think that, for the tests, it doesn't make a difference whether we use an extension or sharing. Wouldn't you agree?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@pgte pgte Jul 4, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

and that, generally, without persistence, these options would be enough..

lock: 'memory'
})
const blockService = new BlockService(repo)
Expand Down