-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ipfs pin update $cid $cid removes pin #6648
Labels
kind/bug
A bug in existing code (including security flaws)
Comments
Stebalien
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 23, 2019
We were pining Y then removing the pin for X. When X == Y, we'd remove the new pin. fixes #6648
Stebalien
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2020
We were pining Y then removing the pin for X. When X == Y, we'd remove the new pin. fixes #6648
Stebalien
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2020
We were pining Y then removing the pin for X. When X == Y, we'd remove the new pin. fixes #6648
Stebalien
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2020
We were pining Y then removing the pin for X. When X == Y, we'd remove the new pin. fixes #6648
ralendor
pushed a commit
to ralendor/go-ipfs
that referenced
this issue
Jun 6, 2020
We were pining Y then removing the pin for X. When X == Y, we'd remove the new pin. fixes ipfs#6648
ralendor
pushed a commit
to ralendor/go-ipfs
that referenced
this issue
Jun 6, 2020
We were pining Y then removing the pin for X. When X == Y, we'd remove the new pin. fixes ipfs#6648
ralendor
pushed a commit
to ralendor/go-ipfs
that referenced
this issue
Jun 8, 2020
We were pining Y then removing the pin for X. When X == Y, we'd remove the new pin. fixes ipfs#6648
ralendor
pushed a commit
to ralendor/go-ipfs
that referenced
this issue
Jun 8, 2020
We were pining Y then removing the pin for X. When X == Y, we'd remove the new pin. fixes ipfs#6648
ralendor
pushed a commit
to ralendor/go-ipfs
that referenced
this issue
Jun 8, 2020
We were pining Y then removing the pin for X. When X == Y, we'd remove the new pin. fixes ipfs#6648
ralendor
pushed a commit
to ralendor/go-ipfs
that referenced
this issue
Jun 8, 2020
We were pining Y then removing the pin for X. When X == Y, we'd remove the new pin. fixes ipfs#6648
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Version information:
Description:
requesting a pin update to the same CID, unpins the CID
Steps to reproduce:
I accidentally found this when implementing an
ipfsfollow
shell script to track the latest version of my /ipns/opensuse.zq1.de on a backup machine.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: